The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y20t and Oppo A76 aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point. However, they take different approaches, with the Oppo A76 leveraging a newer, more efficient chipset and faster charging, while the vivo Y20t focuses on providing a solid experience with a proven platform. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A76 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 680, built on a 6nm process, provides a noticeable performance and efficiency boost over the vivo Y20t’s Snapdragon 662. The significantly faster 33W charging is a game-changer for convenience, making the A76 worth the potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 11 | 2022, February 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 11 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 164.4 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.56 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~83.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Purist Blue | Glowing Black, Glowing Blue |
| Models | V2129 | CPH2375 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 117.99 / £ 162.99 |
vivo Y20t
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Significantly faster 33W charging
- Potentially better battery life due to 6nm process
- May be slightly more expensive than the Y20t
- Camera performance likely similar to Y20t
Oppo A76
- Lower price point
- Proven Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Slower 18W charging
- Less efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on basic usability. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, the real differentiator lies elsewhere. Bezels are expected to be similar, and color accuracy will likely be standard for budget phones.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, relying heavily on software processing. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and multiple secondary sensors (depth, macro). However, without sensor size information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. The image processing style will likely differ between vivo and Oppo, with vivo often favoring brighter, more saturated images. The 2MP macro cameras on both devices are unlikely to deliver significant detail and are primarily for marketing purposes.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A76’s Snapdragon 680 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the vivo Y20t’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to longer battery life and less thermal throttling during sustained tasks. The Snapdragon 680’s CPU, with 4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores, also boasts a higher clock speed than the Y20t’s 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores, resulting in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. While both are octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the 680 provide a tangible performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Oppo A76’s 33W wired charging is a major advantage. This will drastically reduce charging times compared to the vivo Y20t’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 680’s improved efficiency means the A76 will likely offer comparable or even better real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity. The faster charging allows for quick top-ups, minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y20t if you prioritize a proven, reliable chipset and are on an extremely tight budget, accepting slightly slower performance and charging speeds. Buy the Oppo A76 if you value a more modern, efficient processor, faster charging, and are willing to spend a little more for a smoother, more responsive user experience. The A76 is ideal for users who frequently use their phone for social media, streaming, and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo A76 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a smooth experience. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's a noticeable step up from the Snapdragon 662 in the vivo Y20t, offering more stable frame rates and less overheating during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo A76 compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y20t?
The 33W charging on the Oppo A76 will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times depend on battery capacity, you can expect the A76 to charge considerably faster – potentially cutting charging time by 30-50% compared to the Y20t. This is a major convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 662 in the vivo Y20t still a capable processor for everyday tasks?
Yes, the Snapdragon 662 is still perfectly capable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging. However, it will exhibit more lag when multitasking or running demanding apps compared to the newer Snapdragon 680 in the Oppo A76.
