The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y20t, powered by the Snapdragon 662, has been a reliable option for some time. Now, the Honor X8c enters the fray with a newer Snapdragon 685 chipset and significantly faster charging. This comparison dissects the core differences to determine which device offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor X8c is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 685, built on a more efficient 6nm process, delivers noticeably improved performance and efficiency compared to the vivo Y20t’s Snapdragon 662. The 35W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing recharge times, making it ideal for users who prioritize convenience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 11 | 2025, January 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 11 | Available. Released 2025, January 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 161.1 x 74.6 x 7.1 mm (6.34 x 2.94 x 0.28 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 174 g (6.14 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 2800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 50 MP, f/2.1, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0/5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity (ultrasonic) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 35W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Purist Blue | Marrs Green, Midnight Black, Moonlight White, Cloud Purple |
| Models | V2129 | ABR-LX1, ABR-LX2, ABR-LX3 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 190.78 / $ 213.42 / £ 159.00 |
vivo Y20t
- Proven Snapdragon 662 platform
- Reliable and stable software experience (likely)
- Generally lower price point
- Slower 18W charging
- Less efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset
- Older CPU architecture
Honor X8c
- Faster Snapdragon 685 chipset (6nm)
- Significantly faster 35W charging
- More efficient CPU architecture
- Potential for less refined software (Honor's history)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Larger size may not suit all users
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity. However, the Honor X8c’s larger screen size (likely 6.5 inches vs. the Y20t’s 6.45 inches) offers a slightly more immersive experience. Without specific brightness or color gamut data, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the larger canvas of the X8c is a minor advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is challenging. Both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth and macro sensors. The Snapdragon 685’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing, especially in low-light conditions. However, the actual image quality will heavily depend on the sensor used. We can assume the Honor X8c will offer slightly better image quality due to the newer ISP, but the difference won't be dramatic without knowing the sensor details.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X8c’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the vivo Y20t’s Snapdragon 662 (11nm). The 6nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to longer battery life and reduced thermal throttling. While both are octa-core CPUs, the X8c utilizes Cortex-A73 cores (2.8 GHz) in its prime cluster, offering a substantial performance boost over the Y20t’s Kryo 260 Gold cores (2.0 GHz). This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Honor X8c, particularly noticeable in demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Honor X8c’s 35W charging is the standout feature here. The vivo Y20t’s 18W charging feels comparatively slow. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 685’s improved efficiency means the X8c will likely achieve comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. The faster charging significantly reduces downtime, allowing users to quickly top up their device when needed.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y20t if you prioritize a proven, stable software experience and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid, dependable device for basic tasks. Buy the Honor X8c if you value performance, faster charging, and a more modern chipset. This phone is better suited for users who multitask, play mobile games occasionally, or simply dislike waiting for their phone to charge.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the Honor X8c handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 685 is a capable chipset for casual gaming. While it won't deliver flagship-level performance, it should handle PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The improved GPU compared to the Snapdragon 662 in the Y20t will provide a smoother experience.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to charge the Honor X8c from 0% to 100% with the 35W charger?
While Honor doesn't provide exact figures, a 35W charger on a phone with a typical battery capacity (around 5000mAh) should fully charge the device in approximately 60-75 minutes. This is a significant improvement over the 2+ hours likely required for the vivo Y20t’s 18W charging.
❓ Is the software on the Honor X8c heavily customized, and does it include a lot of bloatware?
Honor's Magic UI has evolved, but it still includes a degree of customization and pre-installed apps. While the amount of bloatware has decreased in recent iterations, users should expect to find some pre-loaded applications. It's generally less intrusive than some other Android skins, but it's worth considering if you prefer a stock Android experience.
