The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Oppo A53s 5G and vivo Y20s [G] represent compelling options for users seeking affordability. However, they take different approaches: the Oppo prioritizes 5G connectivity with a more modern chipset, while the vivo focuses on a slightly more refined CPU core configuration within a more established, if less advanced, platform. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo A53s 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset, built on a 7nm process, offers a significant performance advantage and future-proofs with 5G connectivity. While the vivo Y20s [G]'s Helio G80 is capable, the Oppo’s efficiency and speed are more compelling for demanding tasks and longevity.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, April 10 | 2021, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, April 10 | Available. Released 2021, May 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 75.7 x 8.4 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.3 g (6.77 oz) | 189.6 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro)
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | - | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Obsidian Black, Purist Blue | Crystal Blue, Ink Black |
| Models | V2038 | CPH2321 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 170 EUR |
vivo Y20s [G]
- Faster and more efficient Dimensity 700 chipset
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Better power efficiency for longer battery life
- Slower 10W charging
- Potentially less responsive CPU for very basic tasks compared to the Y20s [G]
Oppo A53s 5G
- Faster 18W charging
- Slightly more responsive CPU cores for basic tasks
- Established Helio G80 platform
- Less powerful and less efficient Helio G80 chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Larger 12nm process leads to more heat
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. We lack specific display specs, but the focus here is on processing power, not pixel density. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will be standard for budget phones – adequate, but not color-critical. The display is a secondary consideration in this matchup.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is difficult. Both phones likely feature a primary camera paired with depth and macro sensors. The image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 700 generally offers more advanced image processing capabilities, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance on the Oppo A53s 5G. However, the actual image quality will heavily depend on the sensor used, which is currently unknown. We can assume the 2MP macro sensors on both devices offer limited utility.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The Oppo A53s 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y20s [G]’s Helio G80 (12nm). The 7nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat and sustained performance. The Dimensity 700’s CPU configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores – is faster than the Y20s [G]’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This means quicker app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Oppo. The Dimensity 700 also includes an integrated 5G modem, a feature absent in the Y20s [G].
Battery Life
The Oppo A53s 5G’s 10W charging is slower than the vivo Y20s [G]’s 18W charging. However, the Dimensity 700’s superior power efficiency mitigates this disadvantage. The 7nm process consumes less power, meaning the Oppo can potentially achieve similar or even better battery life despite the slower charging speed. A full charge on the Y20s [G] will be quicker, but the Oppo will likely last longer on a single charge during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y20s [G] if you prioritize a slightly more responsive CPU for everyday tasks and don't require 5G connectivity. It's a solid option for basic smartphone use. Buy the Oppo A53s 5G if you want a faster, more efficient processor, 5G capabilities for future network access, and a device better equipped for gaming and multitasking. The A53s 5G is the smarter long-term investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A53s 5G's Dimensity 700 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Dimensity 700 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match flagship performance, it's a significant step up from the Helio G80 and provides a much smoother gaming experience. Expect to see frame rates around 30-40fps at higher settings.
❓ Does the slower charging speed of the Oppo A53s 5G significantly impact usability?
Not necessarily. The Dimensity 700's superior power efficiency means the Oppo A53s 5G will likely have comparable or better overall battery life, offsetting the slower charging. While the vivo Y20s [G] will charge faster, you may not need to charge it as frequently.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Oppo A53s 5G useful if 5G isn't widely available in my area yet?
Yes, purchasing a 5G phone like the Oppo A53s 5G future-proofs your investment. Even if 5G coverage is limited now, it's expanding rapidly. You'll be ready to take advantage of faster speeds when 5G becomes available in your area, without needing to upgrade your phone.
![Dimensity 700 vs Helio G80: Oppo A53s 5G and vivo Y20s [G] Compared](/media/comparison/images/32458.webp "Dimensity 700 vs Helio G80: Oppo A53s 5G and vivo Y20s [G] Compared")