The vivo Y20i and Oppo A15s represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The Y20i leverages Qualcomm's Snapdragon 460, while the A15s opts for MediaTek's Helio P35. This comparison dissects these key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the vivo Y20i is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 460 chipset, built on a more efficient 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo A15s’ Helio P35, despite the latter’s higher clock speeds. The faster 18W charging is also a significant benefit.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 26. Released 2020, September 03 | 2020, December 18. Released 2020, December 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.3 g (6.77 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 3.15 MP | - |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Browser | WAP 2.0/xHTML, HTML (PocketIE) | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 450 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 6 h 30 min | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawn White, Nebula Blue | Dynamic Black, Fancy White |
| Models | V2027, V2032 | CPH2179 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 130 EUR |
| SAR | 0.61 W/kg (head) 1.81 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y20i
- More efficient Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially longer software support
- Display specs are unknown
- Camera details are limited
Oppo A15s
- Potentially lower price point
- May have a slightly larger display
- Likely similar battery capacity
- Less efficient Helio P35 chipset
- Slower 10W wired charging
- Older CPU architecture
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, detailed specs are missing. Given Oppo’s history, the A15s might prioritize slightly larger screen size, while vivo often focuses on color calibration. Without knowing the resolution or peak brightness, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner. Expect both to be adequate for basic consumption but lacking in vibrancy and sharpness compared to higher-end displays.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, but details are scarce. It’s safe to assume both will include a primary camera and depth sensor, potentially with a macro lens. However, the quality of these sensors is crucial. Without knowing the megapixel counts or sensor sizes, it’s difficult to assess. The image processing capabilities of Qualcomm’s ISP in the Snapdragon 460 might offer a slight edge in dynamic range and noise reduction, but this is speculative. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and shouldn’t heavily influence purchasing decisions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y20i’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm) utilizes Kryo 240 cores, offering a balance of performance and efficiency. The Oppo A15s’ MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm) features Cortex-A53 cores with higher clock speeds (2.35GHz vs 1.8GHz). However, the older Cortex-A53 architecture is less efficient than the Kryo 240. The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 460 further enhances efficiency, translating to better thermal management and sustained performance. While the Helio P35’s higher clock speeds *sound* impressive, they don’t overcome the architectural and process node disadvantages. This means the Y20i will likely handle multitasking and demanding apps more smoothly.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified, but both phones likely house around a 5000mAh battery, standard for this segment. The key differentiator is charging speed. The vivo Y20i supports 18W wired charging, significantly faster than the Oppo A15s’ 10W charging. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime. While a larger battery capacity is desirable, the faster charging of the Y20i mitigates the impact of a potentially slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y20i if you need a phone that feels more responsive for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming. Its more modern chipset architecture will also likely receive software updates for a longer period. Buy the Oppo A15s if your primary concern is maximizing battery life during extremely light usage and you are on a very tight budget, accepting a trade-off in performance and charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P35 in the Oppo A15s struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Helio P35 can handle basic apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, you may experience occasional lag or slowdowns, especially with multiple apps open simultaneously. The Snapdragon 460 in the vivo Y20i offers a smoother experience for these everyday tasks due to its more efficient architecture.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Oppo A15s with its 10W charging?
With 10W charging, the Oppo A15s will likely take over 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. The vivo Y20i’s 18W charging significantly reduces this time, potentially to around 2 hours or less, depending on the battery capacity.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 460 in the vivo Y20i capable of playing any mobile games?
The Snapdragon 460 can handle less demanding mobile games like PUBG Mobile at lower settings. However, don't expect a high-frame-rate experience. The Helio P35 in the Oppo A15s will likely struggle even more with gaming, requiring even lower settings and potentially experiencing significant frame drops.
