The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y20g and Oppo F19s aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, primarily through their chipset choices. This comparison dissects the key differences between the MediaTek Helio G80-powered Y20g and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662-equipped F19s, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups and consistent performance, the Oppo F19s is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 662 offers a slight edge in efficiency, and the 33W charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the Y20g’s 18W charging. While the Y20g is still a capable device, the F19s provides a more refined experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, January 19 | 2021, September 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, January 19 | Available. Released 2021, September 27 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 160.3 x 73.8 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.91 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.3 g (6.77 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769V/CU Helio G80 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR | LED flash, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, 54% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Purist Blue, Obsidian Black | Glowing Black, Glowing Gold |
| Models | V2037, V2065 | CPH2219, CPH2223 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 230 EUR |
vivo Y20g
- Potentially stronger peak CPU performance due to Cortex-A75 cores.
- Competitive price point.
- Mediatek’s HyperEngine game technology may offer slight gaming optimizations.
- Slower 18W charging.
- Less power-efficient chipset (12nm process).
- Potential for more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Oppo F19s
- Faster 33W charging for quicker top-ups.
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 662 chipset (11nm process).
- Generally smoother performance due to optimized architecture.
- CPU core configuration may not match the Y20g's peak performance.
- Potentially slightly higher price.
- Image processing may be overly saturated for some users.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on practicality. Without specific display specs, we can assume similar resolutions and brightness levels. The real difference lies elsewhere.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the presence of sensors, a direct comparison is difficult. However, it’s safe to assume both phones feature a primary camera and supporting lenses for depth or macro photography. The image processing algorithms will likely differ, with Oppo historically leaning towards more vibrant, saturated images, while vivo often aims for a more natural look. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, which may struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core of the distinction lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y20g utilizes the Mediatek Helio G80 (12nm), featuring a dual-cluster CPU design with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This configuration prioritizes peak performance for short bursts. Conversely, the Oppo F19s employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm) with 4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold cores and 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver cores. The Snapdragon 662’s 11nm process offers better power efficiency, translating to longer battery life during sustained use. While both CPUs have similar clock speeds on their performance cores, the Snapdragon 662’s architecture is generally more efficient, and its GPU is better optimized for gaming. The smaller 11nm node contributes to lower heat generation, potentially reducing thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Oppo F19s’ 33W wired charging is a significant advantage. The advertised 54% charge in 30 minutes drastically reduces downtime compared to the vivo Y20g’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 662’s superior power efficiency means the F19s will likely deliver comparable or better real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery capacity. The faster charging speed is a tangible benefit for users who frequently need to top up their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y20g if you prioritize a slightly more powerful CPU core configuration for occasional demanding tasks and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Oppo F19s if you value consistent performance across a wider range of applications, faster charging to minimize downtime, and a generally more efficient chipset for extended battery life during typical usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 662 in the Oppo F19s handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 662 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship gaming experience, it provides a playable experience for casual gamers. The more efficient thermal management of the 11nm process also helps prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Oppo F19s compared to the 18W charging on the vivo Y20g in real-world use?
The Oppo F19s’ 33W charging can realistically add around 50% battery life in approximately 30 minutes, while the vivo Y20g’s 18W charging will likely take closer to an hour or more to achieve the same level of charge. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their phone.
❓ Does the Helio G80 in the vivo Y20g offer any advantages for multitasking?
The Helio G80’s dual-cluster CPU design with Cortex-A75 cores can provide a slight boost in responsiveness when switching between apps. However, the Snapdragon 662’s overall efficiency and optimized architecture generally result in a smoother multitasking experience, even with less powerful individual cores.
