The vivo Y200t and Honor X50 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a smooth user experience, they take drastically different approaches to performance, relying on distinct Snapdragon chipsets. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and gaming capabilities, the Honor X50 GT emerges as the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. However, the vivo Y200t offers a more efficient chipset and faster charging, making it a strong contender for those focused on battery life and everyday tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 20 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 35 min
Reverse wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Green, Blue | Black, Silver |
| Models | V2353DA | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y200t
- Faster 44W charging for quicker top-ups
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 chipset
- Reverse wired charging for topping up accessories
- Significantly lower CPU and GPU performance
- Less capable for demanding games and multitasking
Honor X50 GT
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 performance
- Superior gaming capabilities and multitasking
- Likely better camera performance due to a higher-end sensor
- Slower 35W charging
- Higher power consumption leading to potentially shorter battery life
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price points, both likely feature LCD panels with FHD+ resolution. The Honor X50 GT, being positioned as a gaming phone, may have a slightly higher refresh rate (potentially 120Hz vs 90Hz on the Y200t) to enhance visual fluidity. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration, a known strength of both vivo and Honor.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, both brands typically prioritize main sensor quality. The Honor X50 GT, given its higher price point, likely features a larger main sensor with a wider aperture, resulting in better low-light performance and dynamic range. Image processing algorithms will differ – vivo often leans towards vibrant, saturated colors, while Honor tends towards a more natural look. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the X50 GT is more probable, providing sharper images and smoother video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X50 GT’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) is a flagship-level processor featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, significantly outperforming the vivo Y200t’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). The 8+ Gen 1’s architecture – 1x Cortex-X2, 3x Cortex-A710, and 4x Cortex-A510 – provides a substantial leap in CPU and GPU performance compared to the Y200t’s 4x Cortex-A78 and 4x Cortex-A55 configuration. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a far superior gaming experience on the Honor X50 GT. While both are built on a 4nm process, the 8+ Gen 1’s more advanced architecture offers better sustained performance under load, minimizing throttling. The Honor X50 GT will likely support faster RAM speeds (LPDDR5x) than the Y200t, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The vivo Y200t boasts 44W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in 35 minutes. The Honor X50 GT offers 35W wired charging, slower by comparison. While battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is more power-hungry than the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. Therefore, the Y200t, with its faster charging and more efficient chipset, is likely to offer longer real-world battery life despite potentially having a similar or slightly smaller battery capacity. The Y200t also includes reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the X50 GT.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200t if you need a phone that balances efficiency with usability, prioritizing longer battery life and quicker charging for daily use. It’s ideal for social media, streaming, and light gaming. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you prefer a significantly more powerful processor for demanding games, multitasking, and future-proofing, even if it means slightly reduced battery efficiency and slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known for being relatively efficient for a flagship chip, but it can still generate heat under sustained load. Honor likely employs thermal management solutions like vapor chambers or graphite sheets to mitigate throttling, but some heat is expected during prolonged gaming. The Y200t's Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 will run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Does the vivo Y200t's 44W charging work with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
While vivo doesn't explicitly state PD compatibility, their 44W SuperVOOC charging often utilizes a proprietary protocol. It's best to use the included charger for optimal charging speeds. Using a standard PD charger may result in slower charging times, but it should still function.
❓ Is the performance difference between the two phones noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks, the difference will be minimal. Both phones will handle browsing, social media, and video streaming without issue. However, the Honor X50 GT will exhibit faster app loading times and smoother transitions due to its more powerful processor.
