vivo Y200i vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its 120W charging fully replenishes the battery in just 19 minutes, a substantial advantage over the vivo Y200i's 44W system. However, the Y200i offers a respectable processor for everyday tasks at a potentially lower price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200i | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 21 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, aptX Adaptive | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | V2354A | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y200i
- Potentially lower price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Significantly slower charging speed (44W)
- Likely lower peak display brightness
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- High peak display brightness (1283 nits)
- More powerful Dimensity 7200 Ultra processor
- Potentially higher price
- Higher display brightness may impact battery life
- May require a separate charger for full 120W speed
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ immediately stands out with its measured peak brightness of 1283 nits, offering superior visibility in direct sunlight compared to the vivo Y200i (brightness data unavailable, but likely lower). While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display's impact on power consumption is significant. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s higher brightness will draw more power, but the benefit of readability is substantial. Panel technology details are missing for the Y200i, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ likely employs an AMOLED panel, offering deeper blacks and more vibrant colors.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications beyond the main sensors are limited for both devices. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including larger sensors and improved image stabilization. While the Y200i likely offers a capable camera for casual photography, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is positioned to deliver higher-quality images and videos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of detailed camera specs for the Y200i makes a precise comparison difficult, but Xiaomi typically invests heavily in camera technology for its Pro+ models.
Performance
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is equipped with the MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) than the vivo Y200i’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55). This translates to noticeably faster application loading times and smoother multitasking on the Redmi. Both chips are built on a 4nm process, contributing to improved efficiency, but the Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s superior core architecture provides a performance edge. The Y200i is suitable for everyday tasks, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ can handle more demanding games and applications.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the vivo Y200i’s 44W charging, which takes 36 minutes to reach 50% and considerably longer for a full charge. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s battery capacity is not specified, the active use score of 10:38h suggests excellent battery life. The Y200i’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed implies a potentially smaller battery or less efficient charging circuitry. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers convenience and minimizes downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200i if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize a potentially lower upfront cost. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you value blazing-fast charging, a brighter and more vibrant display for media consumption, and a more powerful processor for demanding applications and gaming.