The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro and vivo Y200i represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco X6 Pro aims for performance dominance with the Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, while the vivo Y200i prioritizes efficiency and a balanced experience with the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly higher performance. However, the vivo Y200i offers a solid, efficient experience for everyday use and benefits from 44W charging with reverse wired capabilities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 21 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 27 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | V2354A | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y200i
- Excellent performance with Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
- Power-efficient chipset for longer battery life
- 44W fast charging with reverse wired capabilities
- Less powerful processor compared to the Poco X6 Pro
- Limited camera details suggest a more basic photography experience
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Exceptional performance with Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Bright and vibrant display for outdoor visibility
- Fast 67W charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0
- Potentially shorter battery life due to the powerful processor
- May run warmer under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the Y200i’s display specifications are not provided, the X6 Pro’s brightness advantage is substantial. The X6 Pro’s panel likely utilizes a higher refresh rate as well, contributing to smoother visuals during gaming and scrolling, a feature not mentioned for the Y200i. The X6 Pro’s brightness is a key differentiator for users who frequently consume content outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for both devices are limited. However, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to feature a more capable camera system, leveraging the processing power of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra for improved image processing. The Y200i likely focuses on providing adequate image quality for social media and casual photography. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment, but the X6 Pro’s chipset suggests superior computational photography capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, with its 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core and 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores, is a substantial leap ahead of the vivo Y200i’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55). The Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s architecture, featuring more high-performance cores, translates to significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, built on a 4nm process, offers good efficiency, but it cannot match the raw power of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra. The X6 Pro’s likely LPDDR5x RAM further enhances its performance advantage.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro delivers an impressive 11:46h of active use, demonstrating strong battery endurance despite its powerful processor. The vivo Y200i’s battery capacity is not specified, but its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset is more power-efficient. However, the X6 Pro’s 67W charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support allows for a full charge in 45 minutes, significantly faster than the Y200i’s 44W charging (50% in 36 minutes). The X6 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Y200i, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200i if you need a reliable daily driver with decent battery life and appreciate a focus on power efficiency for less intensive tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, video editing, or any application that benefits from raw processing power, and are willing to trade some battery life for that performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is a powerful chip, Xiaomi typically implements effective thermal management solutions in the Poco series. Expect some heat during extended gaming, but throttling should be minimized, maintaining consistent performance. The Y200i’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 will run cooler, but at the cost of performance.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y200i sufficient for quick top-ups throughout the day?
44W charging is reasonably fast, reaching 50% charge in 36 minutes. However, the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W charging is significantly quicker, providing a more convenient charging experience, especially for users who frequently need to recharge their phones.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y200i handle multitasking compared to the Dimensity 8300 Ultra?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra excels at multitasking due to its more powerful CPU cores and faster memory interface. The Y200i’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 can handle typical multitasking scenarios, but it may exhibit slowdowns with numerous apps open simultaneously or when switching between demanding applications.
