vivo Y200i vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and significantly faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging capability and impressive 10:28h active use score outweigh the Y200i’s slightly newer chipset, making it the more practical choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200i | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, April 21 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 27 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.7 x 76 x 8 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.72 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.2, A2DP, aptX Adaptive | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 36 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, White | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2354A | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y200i
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset
- Potentially better thermal management
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower 44W charging
- Unspecified display brightness
- Limited battery life data
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Significantly faster 68W charging
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- Impressive 10:28h active use battery life
- 6nm Dimensity 7030 may run warmer
- Less future-proof chipset architecture
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, especially compared to the Y200i, whose display brightness remains unspecified. While both likely utilize OLED panels, the Neo’s higher peak brightness translates to a more vibrant and usable experience in direct sunlight. The lack of information on the Y200i’s panel technology (LTPO, refresh rate) puts it at a disadvantage, suggesting the Neo offers a more premium visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is hampered by a lack of specific sensor information for both devices. However, the focus should be on the main sensors. Without that data, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Y200i is a common, but often underwhelming, feature. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera system is likely to offer more versatility and image quality, assuming it features a higher-resolution primary sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of OIS information for both devices is a notable omission.
Performance
Both phones employ octa-core CPUs with a similar core configuration (2x Cortex-A78 & 6x Cortex-A55), but the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 operates at a higher clock speed (2.5 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Y200i). The Dimensity 7030, built on a 6nm process, also benefits from a more mature architecture. While the Y200i’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 utilizes a more efficient 4nm node, the clock speed and process node difference suggest the Edge 40 Neo will deliver noticeably better performance in demanding tasks and gaming. The Y200i’s 4nm node will likely result in better thermal efficiency, but the Neo’s raw processing power is likely to be higher.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly excels in battery performance and charging speed. Its 10:28h active use score demonstrates superior endurance compared to the Y200i (no data provided). Furthermore, the 68W wired charging capability allows for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, a significant advantage over the Y200i’s 44W charging, which takes 36 minutes for the same level. The Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery capacity, making it the more convenient option for users who need to quickly top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200i if you prioritize a newer chipset architecture and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It’s a solid choice for users who value future-proofing and don't mind topping up their phone more frequently. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value real-world battery endurance, incredibly fast charging, and a brighter display – ideal for power users and those who frequently consume media on the go.