The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200e and Samsung Galaxy A55 represent compelling options. The Y200e aims to deliver strong value with a newer Snapdragon chipset, while the A55 leverages Samsung’s established brand and refined software experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A55 is the superior choice. Its Exynos 1480, while not a performance leader, provides a smooth experience, and the 13:27h active use score demonstrates excellent endurance. However, the vivo Y200e offers a compelling alternative for budget-conscious users who prioritize raw processing power for the price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2024, March 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus+), glass back (Gorilla Glass), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mm (6.34 x 3.05 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 191 g (6.56 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus+ |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~390 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 106.9 cm2 (~85.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Exynos 1480 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Xclipse 530 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 6.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm
5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, flicker | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 32% in 15 min | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Diamond, Saffron Delight | Iceblue, Lilac, Navy, Lemon |
| Models | V2336 | SM-A556V, SM-A556B, SM-A556B/DS, SM-A556E, SM-A556E/DS, SM-A5560 |
| Price | ₹ 19,999 | $ 324.99 / £ 251.50 / € 319.99 / ₹ 23,998 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 1.04 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y200e
- Faster 44W charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially better CPU performance for the price
- Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 offers good efficiency
- Display likely inferior to the A55 in brightness and color accuracy
- Camera performance is an unknown quantity
Samsung Galaxy A55
- Excellent 13:27h battery life in active use
- Brighter and more vibrant display (1010 nits)
- Refined software experience and long-term support
- Slower 25W charging
- Exynos 1480 may exhibit some thermal throttling under heavy load
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A55 boasts a clear advantage in display quality, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1010 nits. This translates to excellent visibility even in direct sunlight, a common pain point for many smartphones. While the vivo Y200e’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match the A55’s brightness. Samsung’s display technology typically prioritizes color accuracy and viewing angles, offering a more immersive experience. The A55’s panel is also likely to benefit from Samsung’s advanced display calibration, resulting in more natural-looking colors.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo Y200e, a direct comparison is challenging. However, Samsung typically excels in image processing, delivering consistent and vibrant photos. The A55 likely benefits from Samsung’s advanced computational photography algorithms. While the Y200e may offer competitive image quality in good lighting conditions, the A55 is expected to perform better in low-light scenarios and offer more versatile shooting modes. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Y200e is a critical unknown; OIS significantly improves image stability and low-light performance.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y200e utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm), while the Samsung Galaxy A55 is powered by the Exynos 1480 (4nm). The A55’s CPU configuration (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) features higher clocked Cortex-A78 cores compared to the Y200e’s (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55). This suggests a performance advantage for the A55 in CPU-intensive tasks. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2’s efficiency, built on a 4nm process, could lead to better thermal management during sustained loads. The A55’s GPU performance will likely be higher, but the Y200e’s Snapdragon chipset may offer better optimization for certain mobile games.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A55 shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 13:27h in active use. This demonstrates excellent power efficiency from the Exynos 1480 and Samsung’s software optimizations. The vivo Y200e compensates with faster charging at 44W, claiming a 32% charge in 15 minutes. The A55’s 25W charging is slower, but the larger battery capacity and efficient chipset mean users may not need to top up as frequently. The Y200e’s faster charging is beneficial for users who frequently need a quick power boost, while the A55 prioritizes overall endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200e if you need a phone that maximizes CPU performance for the price, and fast charging is a priority. Its Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 offers a noticeable edge in tasks like app loading and light gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A55 if you prefer a more polished software experience, a significantly brighter and longer-lasting display, and a proven track record of software updates and overall reliability.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1480 in the Galaxy A55 tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1480 is a capable chip, it's known to exhibit some thermal throttling under sustained heavy loads, like extended gaming. Samsung's software optimizations help mitigate this, but users may experience a slight performance dip after prolonged use. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Y200e, being a more efficient chip, may handle heat slightly better, but its overall performance ceiling is lower.
❓ How significant is the charging speed difference between 44W (Y200e) and 25W (A55) in real-world use?
The Y200e's 44W charging is noticeably faster, delivering 32% charge in 15 minutes. The A55's 25W charging will take longer to reach full capacity. However, the A55's larger battery and efficient chipset mean you may not need to charge as frequently, lessening the impact of the slower charging speed. For users who prioritize quick top-ups, the Y200e is the better choice.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the Y200e powerful enough for demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 can run PUBG and Genshin Impact, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It's not a gaming powerhouse, but it's capable of providing a playable experience. The Exynos 1480 in the A55 will offer a more consistent and higher frame rate experience, especially at higher settings.
