The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200e and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices utilize Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets, they target slightly different priorities – the Y200e focuses on efficiency, while the 12 Pro+ aims for a more robust performance profile. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and faster charging, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset and 67W charging significantly outperform the Y200e’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 and 44W charging, justifying the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | - |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 191 g (6.56 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, flicker | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 32% in 15 min | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black Diamond, Saffron Delight | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | V2336 | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | ₹ 19,999 | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
vivo Y200e
- Potentially better battery efficiency due to the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2.
- Likely more affordable price point.
- Sufficient performance for basic tasks and light gaming.
- Slower charging speed (44W vs 67W).
- Less powerful chipset for demanding applications.
- Likely a less advanced camera system.
Realme 12 Pro+
- Faster and more powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset.
- Significantly faster 67W charging.
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- Potentially higher price.
- May have slightly lower battery life compared to the Y200e (despite longer runtime due to efficiency).
- More powerful chipset may generate more heat under sustained load.
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 802 nits. While the Y200e’s display specs are not provided, this brightness difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. The Realme’s panel likely benefits from a higher peak brightness setting, enhancing HDR content and overall image vibrancy. Without knowing the Y200e’s panel technology (OLED vs LCD) or refresh rate, it’s difficult to assess color accuracy, but the Realme’s brightness advantage is a clear win for users who consume media outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is positioned as a more premium device, suggesting a potentially more sophisticated camera system. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) – a common feature in Pro+ models – would be a significant advantage for capturing sharper images and smoother videos, especially in low-light conditions. We can assume the Realme will have a larger main sensor, contributing to better image quality. The Y200e likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience, but may lack the advanced features and image processing capabilities of the Realme.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the vivo Y200e utilizes the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Realme 12 Pro+ features the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. The 7s Gen 2’s CPU configuration (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) is a step up from the Y200e’s (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55), offering faster processing speeds for demanding tasks. Both are built on a 4nm process, ensuring good efficiency, but the 7s Gen 2’s more powerful cores translate to a noticeable performance advantage in benchmarks and real-world usage. The Realme’s GPU will also handle graphically intensive games with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ demonstrates a clear advantage in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 13:24h. While the Y200e’s battery capacity is unknown, the Realme’s longer runtime suggests a combination of efficient chipset usage and optimized software. Furthermore, the 67W wired charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ is significantly faster than the Y200e’s 44W, reaching 50% charge in just 19 minutes. The Y200e achieves 32% in 15 minutes, highlighting the Realme’s superior charging speed. This faster charging is a major convenience factor for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200e if you prioritize all-day battery life and efficient performance for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand the absolute fastest processing speeds. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and quicker charging, especially if you’re a moderate gamer or frequently use demanding applications. It’s the better choice for power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 in the vivo Y200e struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 is capable of running Genshin Impact, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a playable frame rate. The Realme 12 Pro+'s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 will provide a significantly smoother experience at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y200e in a typical use case?
The Realme 12 Pro+ can reach 50% charge in 19 minutes, while the Y200e takes longer to reach 32% in the same timeframe. This means a full charge on the Realme will be considerably faster, saving you valuable time if you frequently need to top up your battery.
❓ Does the Realme 12 Pro+ tend to overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is generally well-managed in terms of thermal performance. While some heat generation is expected during extended gaming, the Realme 12 Pro+ likely incorporates thermal management solutions to prevent significant throttling and maintain stable performance.
