vivo Y200e vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and fast charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its 10:28h active use score and 68W charging significantly outperform the Y200e. However, the Y200e’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 offers a more modern architecture and potential for future software support.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200e | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 22 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 22 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic or silicone polymer (eco leather) back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 185.5 g or 191 g (6.56 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, flicker | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 32% in 15 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black Diamond, Saffron Delight | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2336 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | ₹ 19,999 | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y200e
- Newer Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 chipset offers potential for future software updates.
- 4nm process may result in better thermal management.
- Potentially more efficient CPU architecture.
- Slower 44W charging.
- Battery life likely inferior to the Edge 40 Neo.
- Limited camera details suggest a less advanced system.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use).
- Ultra-fast 68W charging.
- Brighter display (1073 nits).
- 6nm Dimensity 7030 may throttle under sustained load.
- Older chipset architecture compared to Snapdragon 4 Gen 2.
- Camera details are limited, but likely not a flagship-level experience.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. While the Y200e’s display specifications are not provided, this brightness difference will be immediately noticeable in outdoor conditions. The Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. We can assume the Y200e's display is adequate for indoor use, but lacks the headroom of the Motorola. Panel technology and refresh rate details are missing for the Y200e, making a direct comparison of color accuracy and smoothness impossible.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo / Video' are absent for both devices, making a comprehensive comparison difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 40 Neo likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Motorola often prioritizes camera performance in its Edge series. The absence of details on sensor size and aperture for the Y200e suggests a more basic camera setup. We can assume both phones will include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, but the Edge 40 Neo is likely to offer better low-light performance and more detailed images.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) and the vivo Y200e’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4nm) represent different approaches to mid-range performance. The Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, has a slight clock speed advantage over the Y200e’s 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores. However, the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 benefits from a more efficient 4nm manufacturing process. This smaller node generally leads to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. The Y200e’s newer architecture may also offer improvements in AI processing and image signal processing. The Edge 40 Neo’s 6nm process will still deliver strong performance, but the Y200e has a potential edge in sustained performance and efficiency.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly wins in battery performance. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80 hours demonstrate exceptional longevity. The Y200e’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 44W charging, while respectable, is significantly slower than the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging. The Edge 40 Neo can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Y200e takes the same amount of time to reach only 32%. This faster charging is a significant advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200e if you prioritize a newer chipset architecture for potentially longer software support and slightly better long-term performance, even if it means sacrificing some battery life and charging speed. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you value all-day battery life, incredibly fast 68W charging, and a proven track record of real-world endurance, making it ideal for heavy users and travelers.