The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200 and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take different approaches. The Y200 focuses on a balance of features with a Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, while the 12 Pro+ pushes for more performance with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 and faster charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you choose the right phone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift, and the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Y200 offers a respectable experience, the 12 Pro+'s superior processing power and faster charging justify the potential price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | - |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Purple, Black | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | - | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y200
- Balanced feature set for everyday use
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 chipset
- Slower 44W charging
- Display brightness likely lower than Realme 12 Pro+
Realme 12 Pro+
- Faster Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 processor
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- Brighter 802 nit display
- Potentially higher price
- Battery capacity not explicitly stated
- May require more frequent software updates
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a measured peak brightness of 802 nits, a significant advantage over the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y200. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market trends), the higher brightness of the Realme ensures better visibility outdoors. Details regarding refresh rates and PWM dimming are missing for the Y200, but the 12 Pro+’s brightness and likely higher refresh rate contribute to a more vibrant and responsive viewing experience. Bezels are expected to be similar on both devices, given their price points, but the Realme’s display is demonstrably brighter.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the vivo Y200, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The focus should be on the primary sensor capabilities, as the inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on either device offers limited practical benefit. The Realme’s image processing is likely tuned for vibrant colors and social media-ready shots, while the Y200’s processing may lean towards a more natural look. OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) is a key feature to look for in the Realme 12 Pro+, which would provide sharper images and smoother video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm) is a clear upgrade over the vivo Y200’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6nm). The 7s Gen 2 features a more powerful CPU configuration – 4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 cores versus the Y200’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The 4nm process node of the 7s Gen 2 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones likely feature adequate RAM, the superior chipset in the Realme 12 Pro+ will deliver a more responsive and fluid user experience, particularly for gaming and demanding apps.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ shines in the battery and charging department. Its 67W wired charging can replenish 50% of the battery in just 19 minutes, a significant time saver compared to the vivo Y200’s 44W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 80%. While the Realme 12 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 13:24h demonstrates excellent battery life. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s 4nm efficiency likely contributes to this longevity. The Y200’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed suggests it may require more time to fully recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 if you prioritize a balanced feature set and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. It's a solid choice for users who don't demand the absolute fastest performance. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value performance for gaming, multitasking, and content creation, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. It's the better option for power users and those who want a phone that can keep up with demanding workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ handle demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 is capable of running demanding games like Genshin Impact and Call of Duty Mobile at medium to high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match the performance of flagship chipsets, it offers a significant improvement over the Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 in the vivo Y200, providing a smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ compared to the 44W charging on the vivo Y200 in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ is considerably faster. It can reach 50% charge in just 19 minutes, while the Y200 takes 30 minutes to reach 80%. This translates to significantly less downtime and more time using your phone. For users who frequently need to top up their battery, the 67W charging is a major advantage.
❓ Is the camera on the Realme 12 Pro+ good for taking photos in low-light conditions?
While detailed camera specs are limited, the Realme 12 Pro+ is expected to perform well in low-light conditions, potentially featuring a larger sensor and OIS. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2’s image signal processor (ISP) also contributes to improved low-light performance by reducing noise and enhancing detail.
