vivo Y200 vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Mid-Range Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use score outweigh the Y200’s slightly lower price point, offering a more convenient and reliable experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, October | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4800 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green, Purple, Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | - |
vivo Y200
- Potentially lower price point
- Efficient Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 chipset
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower 44W charging
- Likely dimmer display
- Potentially less powerful CPU/GPU
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 min)
- Brighter 1073 nit display
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Potentially higher price
- May not have reverse wireless charging
- No information on RAM type/speed
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1073 nits. This is a crucial advantage for outdoor visibility, especially in direct sunlight. While the vivo Y200’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be dimmer. The Edge 40 Neo’s brightness, combined with its likely higher color accuracy (typical of Motorola’s displays), makes it the superior choice for media consumption and general use. We expect the Edge 40 Neo to have a higher refresh rate as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the vivo Y200, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is expected to have a more refined camera system, focusing on image processing and potentially offering features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS). The Edge 40 Neo’s camera is likely to excel in low-light conditions due to its larger sensor and advanced algorithms. We can assume the Y200 will include a standard set of lenses, but the Edge 40 Neo’s emphasis on photo and video quality gives it an advantage.
Performance
Both the vivo Y200 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo utilize 6nm process nodes, indicating similar power efficiency. However, the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo features slightly faster CPU cores (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 in the Snapdragon 4 Gen 1), suggesting a performance edge in CPU-intensive tasks. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 focuses on efficiency, making the Y200 suitable for everyday tasks, while the Dimensity 7030 offers more headroom for multitasking and demanding applications. The GPU performance difference is also likely to favor the Edge 40 Neo, potentially offering a smoother gaming experience.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery department. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80 hours demonstrate excellent battery life. Crucially, the 68W wired charging allows for a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, a significant time saver. The vivo Y200’s 44W charging, while respectable, is considerably slower. While the Y200’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s combination of efficiency and fast charging provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 if you need a functional, everyday smartphone with a focus on cost-effectiveness and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a brighter display, significantly faster charging, and longer battery life, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.