Xiaomi 13T Pro vs. vivo Y200 Pro: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 13T Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9200+ chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power. However, the vivo Y200 Pro provides excellent value for those seeking 5G connectivity and a dependable experience without breaking the bank.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200 Pro | Xiaomi 13T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 21 | 2023, September 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 21 | Available. Released 2023, September 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back or silicone polymer back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 162.2 x 75.7 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 200 g or 206 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 2600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Leica lens, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.28", 1.22µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/1.9, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.88", 0.61µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm (ultrawide), 1/3.06", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 4K/1080p@30fps HDR10+, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; 10-bit LOG, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR10+ |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), NavIC (L5), BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, dual/tri-band (market/region dependent), Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Alpine Blue, Meadow Green, Black |
| Models | V2401 | 23078PND5G |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 370.00 / £ 482.55 / € 301.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y200 Pro
- Affordable 5G connectivity
- Reliable Snapdragon 695 performance for everyday tasks
- 44W fast charging with reverse wired charging
- Significantly less powerful than the Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Display brightness likely lower than the competition
- Limited camera details available
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Flagship-level Dimensity 9200+ performance
- Ultra-fast 120W charging (0-100% in 19 minutes)
- Bright and vibrant display (1094 nits)
- Higher price point
- Potential for higher heat generation under sustained load
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 13T Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1094 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y200 Pro. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels for vibrant colors, the Xiaomi’s brightness advantage is a key differentiator. Details regarding refresh rate and resolution are missing for the Y200 Pro, but the 13T Pro’s brightness suggests a focus on visual clarity.
Camera Comparison
The context data lacks detailed camera specifications for both devices, making a precise comparison difficult. However, the Xiaomi 13T Pro, positioned as a higher-tier device, likely features a more sophisticated camera system with a larger sensor and advanced image processing capabilities. The absence of information on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) for either phone is notable; its presence would significantly improve low-light photography and video stability. We can assume the Xiaomi will offer more versatile shooting modes and better overall image quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these devices is substantial. The Xiaomi 13T Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200+ (4nm) is a flagship-level chipset featuring a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.35 GHz, designed for peak performance. This contrasts sharply with the vivo Y200 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Snapdragon 695, while capable for everyday tasks, is a mid-range processor. The Dimensity 9200+'s 4nm process node also offers superior power efficiency, potentially leading to better sustained performance under load. The Xiaomi will handle demanding games and applications with ease, while the vivo may exhibit slowdowns in more intensive scenarios.
Battery Life
The Xiaomi 13T Pro excels in charging speed with its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is a massive advantage over the vivo Y200 Pro’s 44W charging. While the Xiaomi 13T Pro’s battery capacity isn’t explicitly stated, its active use score of 11:50h and endurance rating of 102h suggest a well-optimized battery life. The vivo Y200 Pro’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed implies a longer recharge time. The Xiaomi’s faster charging is a significant convenience factor for power users.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 Pro if you need a reliable 5G smartphone for everyday tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize affordability. Buy the Xiaomi 13T Pro if you demand high-end performance for demanding games, video editing, or multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging.