The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200 Pro and Realme 11 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices target a similar price bracket, they diverge significantly in their core components, particularly in chipset and charging technology. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid charging and a brighter display, the Realme 11 Pro+ is the stronger choice. Its 100W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the 793 nits peak brightness provides excellent outdoor visibility. However, the vivo Y200 Pro offers a solid, efficient experience for everyday tasks and benefits from Qualcomm's established software optimization.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 21 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 21 | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired
Reverse wired | 100W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | V2401 | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
vivo Y200 Pro
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 offers efficient power consumption.
- Potentially more stable software experience due to Qualcomm's optimization.
- Reverse wired charging provides added convenience.
- Slower 44W charging compared to the Realme 11 Pro+.
- Likely less powerful CPU and GPU for demanding tasks.
Realme 11 Pro+
- Blazing-fast 100W wired charging for minimal downtime.
- Brighter 793 nits display for excellent outdoor visibility.
- More powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7050 chipset for gaming and multitasking.
- Mediatek chipsets sometimes have less consistent software support.
- Potentially less efficient power consumption compared to Snapdragon.
Display Comparison
The Realme 11 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 793 nits, making it considerably more usable in direct sunlight compared to the vivo Y200 Pro (brightness data unavailable, assumed lower based on segment). While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Realme’s higher peak brightness is a tangible advantage. Details regarding refresh rate, resolution, and PWM dimming are missing for both, but the Realme’s brightness advantage is a clear win for outdoor visibility. The absence of LTPO technology on either device suggests a less adaptive refresh rate, potentially impacting battery life during static content viewing.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond 'Photo/Video' are absent for both devices. However, given the market positioning, it’s reasonable to assume both feature multi-camera setups. The Realme 11 Pro+ is known for its 200MP main sensor (outside of provided context, but a key marketing feature), which, while high resolution, doesn’t automatically equate to superior image quality. Sensor size and image processing algorithms are crucial. The vivo Y200 Pro likely employs a more conventional sensor. Without further data, it’s difficult to definitively assess camera performance, but the Realme’s higher megapixel count suggests a potential advantage in detail capture, assuming effective pixel binning.
Performance
The Realme 11 Pro+ leverages the Mediatek Dimensity 7050, built on a 6nm process, featuring a more powerful CPU configuration with 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This contrasts with the vivo Y200 Pro’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, also on 6nm, but with a less aggressive core setup of 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold and 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver. The Dimensity 7050’s Cortex-A78 cores offer a performance uplift in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. While both chipsets support 5G, the Realme’s GPU is likely to deliver a smoother experience in graphically demanding games. The Snapdragon 695 prioritizes efficiency, while the Dimensity 7050 aims for a balance of power and efficiency.
Battery Life
The Realme 11 Pro+’s standout feature is its 100W wired charging, a significant advantage over the vivo Y200 Pro’s 44W charging. This translates to drastically faster charging times – a full charge from 0-100% on the Realme will take considerably less time. The Realme 11 Pro+ had an endurance rating of 112h, suggesting good battery optimization. While the Y200 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed means longer periods tethered to a power outlet. The Realme’s faster charging is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 Pro if you prioritize a stable, well-optimized software experience with a focus on consistent performance for daily tasks and moderate gaming. It’s ideal for users who don’t demand the absolute fastest charging speeds. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you value blazing-fast 100W charging, a brighter display for outdoor use, and a chipset geared towards slightly more demanding gaming scenarios. It’s the better option for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing a quick top-up.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 in the Realme 11 Pro+ suffer from significant thermal throttling during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 7050 is a capable chipset, sustained peak performance can lead to thermal throttling. However, Realme typically implements effective cooling solutions in their Pro+ series, mitigating this issue to a degree. Expect some performance reduction after extended gaming, but it shouldn't be severe enough to render games unplayable.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y200 Pro slow enough to be a major inconvenience in daily use?
44W charging is adequate for overnight charging, but it's noticeably slower than the 100W charging on the Realme 11 Pro+. If you frequently need to top up your battery quickly throughout the day, the slower charging speed could be a drawback. However, for users who primarily charge their phones overnight, it's unlikely to be a significant issue.
❓ Given the lack of detailed camera specs, how do these phones likely perform in low-light conditions?
Without knowing sensor sizes and aperture values, it's difficult to say definitively. However, larger sensors generally perform better in low light. The Realme 11 Pro+'s likely larger main sensor (200MP) suggests a potential advantage in low-light photography, but image processing algorithms play a crucial role. Expect both phones to offer decent low-light performance, but the Realme may have a slight edge.
