vivo Y200 Pro vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Contenders
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a brighter display, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the stronger choice. Its 68W charging significantly outperforms the Y200 Pro’s 44W, and the measured 1073 nits brightness provides a superior viewing experience. However, the Y200 Pro offers a viable alternative for those seeking a more affordable 5G experience.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200 Pro | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 21 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 21 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | V2401 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y200 Pro
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Reliable 5G connectivity with Snapdragon 695
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Slower 44W charging
- Less powerful processor compared to Dimensity 7030
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging (50% in 15 mins)
- Brighter 1073 nits display
- More powerful MediaTek Dimensity 7030 processor
- Potentially higher price
- Limited camera details available
- Display brightness may impact battery life
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significant advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is a crucial benefit for outdoor visibility, surpassing what we'd expect from the Y200 Pro, which lacks published brightness data. While both utilize 6nm chipsets, the brighter display of the Edge 40 Neo will consume more power, impacting battery life. Details regarding panel type (AMOLED vs LCD) and refresh rate are missing for the Y200 Pro, but the Edge 40 Neo's display is a clear standout.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond 'Photo/Video' are sparse for the Edge 40 Neo, but Motorola typically focuses on computational photography. The Y200 Pro’s camera specifications are also limited. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely irrelevant; image quality will be limited by the small sensor size. The real differentiator will be image processing algorithms and low-light performance, which require dedicated testing.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a performance edge over the vivo Y200 Pro’s Snapdragon 695 5G (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold). The Cortex-A78 architecture is generally more efficient and powerful than the Kryo 660 Gold. While both are 6nm chips, the Dimensity 7030’s CPU configuration translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The Y200 Pro will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Edge 40 Neo is better equipped for more demanding workloads. RAM configurations are not specified, but LPDDR5x support on the Edge 40 Neo would further enhance performance.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in the battery and charging department. Its 68W wired charging capability can deliver a 50% charge in just 15 minutes, a significant advantage over the vivo Y200 Pro’s 44W charging. The Edge 40 Neo also boasts an impressive active use battery score of 10:28h and an endurance rating of 80 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the Y200 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, the slower charging speed suggests it may need more frequent top-ups. The Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging mitigates concerns about battery drain.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 Pro if you need a reliable 5G connection on a tighter budget and aren't heavily reliant on demanding applications. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize faster charging speeds, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a slightly more powerful processor for smoother multitasking and gaming.