vivo Y200 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a: Which Mid-Range Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and software experience, the Google Pixel 7a is the clear winner. Its Tensor G2 chip, coupled with Google’s image processing, consistently delivers superior photos and videos. However, the vivo Y200 Pro’s 44W charging offers a significant convenience advantage.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 21 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 21 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.9 x 7.5 mm (6.47 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 172 g or 183 g (6.07 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 44W wired Reverse wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silk black, Silk green | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | V2401 | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
vivo Y200 Pro
- 44W Fast Charging for quick top-ups
- Reverse Wired Charging for powering other devices
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Less powerful Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Uncertain display quality compared to Pixel 7a
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior performance with Google Tensor G2
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Excellent software support and updates
- Slower 18W charging
- No reverse wireless charging
- Higher price compared to the Y200 Pro
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, providing excellent visibility in direct sunlight. While the Y200 Pro’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s display technology, though not LTPO, is known for its color accuracy and sharpness. The absence of detailed display specs for the Y200 Pro makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Pixel 7a holds a clear advantage in measured brightness.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a excels in computational photography, leveraging the Tensor G2’s image signal processor (ISP) to produce stunning images, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While the Y200 Pro’s camera specs are not detailed, it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image quality. Google’s software algorithms, like Super Res Zoom and Magic Eraser, provide significant advantages. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also superior, offering excellent stabilization and dynamic range. The Y200 Pro may offer a higher megapixel count, but sensor size and image processing are more critical factors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) is architecturally superior to the vivo Y200 Pro’s Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Tensor G2 features a tri-cluster configuration with Cortex-X1 cores for peak performance, Cortex-A78 cores for sustained tasks, and Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency. The Snapdragon 695 utilizes Kryo 660 cores, which, while capable, are less powerful. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Pixel 7a. The 5nm process node of the Tensor G2 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing throttling during demanding workloads. The Y200 Pro will handle everyday tasks adequately, but the Pixel 7a offers a more responsive and future-proof experience.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating strong battery life. While the Y200 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 44W wired charging significantly outperforms the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging. This means the Y200 Pro can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. The Pixel 7a supports PD3.0, offering some fast charging compatibility, but it’s still considerably slower than the Y200 Pro’s 44W solution. The Y200 Pro also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Pixel 7a.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 Pro if you need exceptionally fast charging and prioritize a potentially wider range of features, even if it means sacrificing peak performance and camera prowess. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prefer a streamlined software experience, outstanding camera capabilities, and a processor optimized for AI tasks, even if charging is slower and the feature set is more focused.