The mid-range smartphone market in India is fiercely competitive. The Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro aims to deliver flagship-level performance at a disruptive price, while the vivo Y200 (India) focuses on a balanced experience with a focus on everyday usability. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and gaming, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset significantly outperforms the Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 in the vivo Y200. However, the vivo Y200 offers a more streamlined experience and potentially better efficiency for basic tasks.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, October 23 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 23 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4375 Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 50% in 28 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jungle Green, Desert Gold | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | V2307 | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.86 W/kg (body) | - |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y200 (India)
- More affordable price point
- Potentially smoother software experience (vivo's Funtouch OS)
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X6 Pro
- Less capable camera system
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Faster 67W charging
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Potentially more aggressive thermal throttling under sustained load
- Xiaomi's MIUI can be feature-rich but also bloated
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the vivo Y200, whose brightness is not specified. While the Y200’s panel characteristics are unknown, the X6 Pro’s high brightness is a major advantage. We expect the X6 Pro to have a higher refresh rate as well, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rate switching rather than variable refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones are expected to have multi-camera setups, but the specifics are unknown for the vivo Y200. The Poco X6 Pro’s camera capabilities will depend heavily on its main sensor and image processing algorithms. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. We can assume the Poco X6 Pro will offer more advanced features and potentially better low-light performance due to its higher-end chipset’s image signal processor (ISP). The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact overall camera quality.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, built on a 4nm process, is a powerhouse. Its octa-core configuration (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance than the vivo Y200’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55). The 4nm node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 4 Gen 1, while efficient, is targeted at a lower performance tier. The Poco X6 Pro is likely to handle graphically intensive games at higher settings with smoother frame rates.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support is considerably faster than the vivo Y200’s 44W charging. The X6 Pro can reach 100% charge in 45 minutes, while the Y200 takes 28 minutes to reach 50%. The Poco X6 Pro also demonstrates strong battery life with an active use score of 11:46h, suggesting efficient power management despite its powerful chipset. While the Y200’s battery capacity is unknown, the faster charging and longer active use time of the X6 Pro give it a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 (India) if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for social media, calls, and light multitasking, and value a potentially smoother software experience. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you prioritize gaming, demanding applications, and want the fastest possible performance within a mid-range budget, even if it means sacrificing some battery efficiency.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco X6 Pro’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra get noticeably hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 8300 Ultra is efficient, its high performance will generate heat. The Poco X6 Pro likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but some throttling is possible during extended, graphically demanding games. However, the 4nm process helps mitigate this compared to older, larger node chipsets.
❓ Is the 44W charging on the vivo Y200 sufficient for a typical user?
44W charging is adequate for most users, providing a full charge in a reasonable timeframe. However, it's significantly slower than the Poco X6 Pro’s 67W charging. If you frequently need to quickly top up your battery, the Poco X6 Pro is the better choice.
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro support high refresh rate gaming?
The Poco X6 Pro is expected to support high refresh rate gaming, likely up to 120Hz, thanks to its powerful GPU and display capabilities. This will result in smoother and more responsive gameplay in supported titles. However, achieving consistently high frame rates will depend on the game's optimization.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on each device?
The provided data does not specify storage options. However, based on market trends, both devices are likely to offer multiple storage configurations, potentially including 128GB, 256GB, and 512GB options. The Poco X6 Pro may also support faster UFS 4.0 storage for improved read/write speeds.
