The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200 GT and Realme GT Neo6 SE are two compelling contenders vying for your attention. Both leverage Qualcomm's 7-series silicon, but significant differences in chipset generation and charging capabilities create a clear distinction. This comparison dissects these phones to determine which delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme GT Neo6 SE emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Y200 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, and the 100W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Y200 GT offers a competitive package, the Neo6 SE’s speed advantage justifies the potential price premium.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2024, April 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 20 | Available. Released 2024, April 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 162 x 75.1 x 8.7 mm (6.38 x 2.96 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.6 g (6.88 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 732 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC, GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 26 min
7.5W reverse wired | 100W wired, 50% in 12 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Silver, Green |
| Models | V2361GA | RMX3850 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 250 EUR |
vivo Y200 GT
- Competitive price point
- 80W fast charging is still respectable
- 7.5W reverse wired charging
- Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 is outperformed by the 7+ Gen 3
- Charging speed is slower than the competition
Realme GT Neo6 SE
- Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 delivers superior performance
- 100W SuperVOOC charging is incredibly fast
- Likely better thermal management due to chipset efficiency
- May be slightly more expensive than the Y200 GT
- Reverse charging capability is unknown
Display Comparison
Both devices utilize 6.78-inch AMOLED displays, but detailed specifications like resolution and refresh rate are missing. However, the core difference lies in the processing power driving them. The Realme GT Neo6 SE, with its superior chipset, will likely handle graphically intensive tasks and high refresh rate gaming more smoothly. Without knowing the peak brightness or color accuracy figures, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the chipset advantage gives the Neo6 SE an edge in overall display responsiveness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, both phones likely employ similar image signal processors (ISPs) within their respective Snapdragon chips. The Realme GT Neo6 SE’s superior processing power could lead to faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) makes it difficult to assess image quality definitively. We can assume both phones will offer acceptable camera performance for social media and casual photography, but the Neo6 SE has the potential for more refined image processing.
Performance
The Realme GT Neo6 SE’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is the clear performance champion. Built on the same 4nm process as the Y200 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, the 7+ Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 2.8 GHz, compared to the Y200 GT’s Cortex-A715 core at 2.63 GHz. This architectural upgrade, coupled with higher clock speeds on the A720 cores (2.6 GHz vs 2.4 GHz), translates to a significant boost in CPU and GPU performance. The Neo6 SE will excel in demanding games and multitasking scenarios, while the Y200 GT will provide a smooth experience for everyday use. The Neo6 SE's LPDDR5x RAM further enhances its performance capabilities.
Battery Life
The Realme GT Neo6 SE’s 100W wired charging is a game-changer, achieving a 50% charge in just 12 minutes. This is significantly faster than the vivo Y200 GT’s 80W charging, which takes 26 minutes for the same level. While battery capacity is unknown for both devices, the Neo6 SE’s faster charging mitigates any potential disadvantage in capacity. The 7.5W reverse wired charging on the Y200 GT is a useful addition for topping up accessories, but the Neo6 SE’s charging speed is the primary advantage here.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 GT if you prioritize a balance of features and affordability, and aren't heavily reliant on demanding mobile games. It's a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks and casual gaming. Buy the Realme GT Neo6 SE if you demand faster performance for gaming and content creation, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid charging. It’s the better option for power users who need a responsive and efficient device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Realme GT Neo6 SE’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is a capable chipset for gaming. It should comfortably run Genshin Impact at high settings with stable frame rates, though sustained performance will depend on thermal management. Expect a smoother gaming experience compared to the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the vivo Y200 GT.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the Realme GT Neo6 SE compared to the 80W charging on the vivo Y200 GT in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. While both offer fast charging, the Neo6 SE’s 100W charging can top up the battery from 0-50% in approximately 12 minutes, whereas the Y200 GT takes 26 minutes for the same. This translates to significantly less downtime and more time using your phone.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the Realme GT Neo6 SE generate more heat than the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the vivo Y200 GT?
While the 7+ Gen 3 is more powerful, it's also built on the same 4nm process, which generally improves thermal efficiency. Realme likely incorporates effective cooling solutions to manage heat, and the performance gains outweigh any potential for increased temperatures during typical use.
