The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200 GT and OnePlus Ace 3V are two compelling contenders. Both devices center around Qualcomm's latest Snapdragon 7-series silicon, but diverge in charging speed and CPU architecture. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which phone delivers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Ace 3V emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Y200 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, and the 100W charging is significantly faster, reaching 100% in the same time it takes the Y200 GT to reach 50%.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2024, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 20 | Available. Released 2024, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 162.7 x 75.2 x 8.5 mm (6.41 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.6 g (6.88 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1240 x 2772 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~451 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (HBM), 2150 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 732 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 26 min
7.5W reverse wired | 100W wired, 100% in 26 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Purple, Gray |
| Models | V2361GA | PJF110 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y200 GT
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Solid all-around performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 chipset
- Slower 80W charging
- Less powerful CPU compared to the Ace 3V
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
OnePlus Ace 3V
- Faster Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset
- Ultra-fast 100W charging
- Superior gaming performance
- Likely a higher price tag
- May run slightly warmer under heavy load
- OnePlus’ OxygenOS can be polarizing
Display Comparison
While both phones likely feature high refresh rate AMOLED displays (data not provided), the core difference lies under the hood. The chipset dictates display responsiveness. The Ace 3V’s more powerful GPU will translate to smoother animations and higher frame rates in games. Without specific display specs, it's difficult to assess color accuracy or peak brightness, but OnePlus generally prioritizes vibrant, punchy colors, while vivo often aims for more natural tones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, both brands typically employ capable main sensors. The Ace 3V’s processing pipeline is likely tuned for a more vibrant, social media-ready aesthetic, while vivo often emphasizes natural-looking images. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS makes it difficult to determine which phone will excel in low-light conditions. We can assume both will include standard wide and ultrawide lenses, but the quality will depend on the sensor and image processing.
Performance
The OnePlus Ace 3V’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is the clear winner here. The shift from the Y200 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 to the ‘+’ variant brings a significant CPU upgrade, swapping the Cortex-A715 cores for the newer, faster Cortex-A720 cores and adding a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 2.8GHz. This translates to approximately 15-20% faster CPU performance in benchmarks and real-world applications. The GPU upgrade in the 7+ Gen 3 further enhances gaming performance. Both phones utilize a 4nm process, but the architectural improvements in the 7+ Gen 3 provide a tangible advantage.
Battery Life
The charging speeds are a key differentiator. The OnePlus Ace 3V’s 100W charging is a game-changer, promising a full charge in just 26 minutes. The vivo Y200 GT’s 80W charging, while still fast, takes significantly longer to reach 100% – hitting only 50% in the same 26-minute timeframe. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging of the Ace 3V mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. This is a significant benefit for users who frequently need to quickly top up their phones.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 GT if you prioritize a slightly more affordable entry point and are comfortable with a slower charging experience. It’s a solid all-rounder for everyday tasks and casual gaming. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3V if you demand faster performance for gaming and demanding apps, and value the convenience of incredibly rapid 100W charging. It’s the better option for power users and those who frequently top up their battery.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the OnePlus Ace 3V handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is a capable chipset for gaming. While it won't match the performance of flagship processors, it should comfortably run Genshin Impact at high settings with stable frame rates, especially with optimized game settings. The improved GPU in the 7+ Gen 3 is a key factor here.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the OnePlus Ace 3V compared to the 80W charging on the vivo Y200 GT in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Ace 3V can fully charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 26 minutes. The Y200 GT takes the same amount of time to reach only 50%. This means you can get a full charge in the time it takes the Y200 GT to get halfway there, making the Ace 3V ideal for users who need quick top-ups.
❓ Does either phone support expandable storage via microSD card?
Neither vivo nor OnePlus typically include microSD card slots in their mid-range devices. Users should carefully consider their storage needs when purchasing, as internal storage is likely the only option.
❓ What kind of cooling system does each phone employ to manage heat during gaming?
Specific cooling system details aren't provided. However, both brands utilize passive cooling solutions like graphite sheets and heat pipes. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the Ace 3V, while more powerful, is also more efficient, potentially leading to better thermal management despite the increased performance.
