The Honor X50 GT and vivo Y200 GT represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches. The X50 GT leverages the older, but still potent, Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Y200 GT opts for the newer, more efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. This comparison will dissect the implications of these chipset choices and explore which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and sustained gaming, the Honor X50 GT is the clear winner thanks to its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1. However, the vivo Y200 GT offers a more balanced package with faster 80W charging and potentially better thermal management due to the 4nm process, making it ideal for everyday users and casual gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2024, January 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 20 | Available. Released 2024, January 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.7 x 75.9 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 163.6 x 75.5 x 8 mm (6.44 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194.6 g (6.88 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~453 ppi density) | 1220 x 2652 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~431 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 112.6 cm2 (~91.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR, 4500 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x2.63 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM7550-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 720 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 13, MagicOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, ultrasound proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 26 min
7.5W reverse wired | 35W wired
7.5W reverse wired |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue | Black, Silver |
| Models | V2361GA | ALP-AN00 |
| Price | About 230 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y200 GT
- Superior CPU and GPU performance with Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Faster processing for demanding apps and games
- Potentially better sustained performance in graphically intensive tasks
- Slower 35W charging
- Higher power consumption potentially leading to shorter battery life
- May experience more thermal throttling under heavy load
Honor X50 GT
- Faster 80W wired charging
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
- Potentially better thermal management
- Likely longer battery life
- Lower peak performance compared to Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
- Less capable GPU for demanding games
- May struggle with extremely demanding applications
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the X50 GT's focus on gaming, it's reasonable to expect a high refresh rate panel. The Y200 GT, positioned as a more balanced device, may prioritize color accuracy and power efficiency. The absence of LTPO technology in either device is likely, keeping costs down. Bezels and color accuracy will be key differentiators, requiring hands-on testing.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. Both phones likely employ multi-camera systems, but the quality will depend heavily on sensor size, aperture, and image processing algorithms. The absence of information suggests neither phone will feature a flagship-level camera system. Expect computational photography to play a significant role in image quality. The inclusion of OIS on the main sensor would be a key advantage for either device, improving low-light performance and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor X50 GT’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4nm) boasts a prime Cortex-X2 core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside three Cortex-A710 cores at 2.5 GHz and four Cortex-A510 cores at 1.8 GHz. This configuration delivers significantly higher peak performance than the vivo Y200 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4nm). The Y200 GT features a Cortex-A715 prime core at 2.63 GHz, four more A715 cores at 2.4 GHz, and three A510 cores at 1.8 GHz. While the 7 Gen 3 benefits from a newer architecture and 4nm process, the 8+ Gen 1’s superior core configuration and higher clock speeds translate to a noticeable advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The GPU within the 8+ Gen 1 will also provide a substantial graphics performance uplift. However, the 7 Gen 3’s efficiency may lead to less thermal throttling during prolonged use.
Battery Life
The vivo Y200 GT’s 80W wired charging is a significant advantage, promising a 50% charge in just 26 minutes. The Honor X50 GT’s 35W charging is considerably slower. Both devices offer 7.5W reverse wired charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s higher power consumption in the X50 GT will likely necessitate a larger battery to achieve comparable battery life to the Y200 GT. The Y200 GT’s more efficient chipset and faster charging make it the more convenient option for users who prioritize battery life and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 GT if you need a phone with exceptionally fast charging, prioritize battery efficiency for all-day use, and enjoy mobile gaming at moderate settings. Buy the Honor X50 GT if you demand maximum performance for demanding games and applications, and are willing to trade some battery life and charging speed for that extra power. The X50 GT is for the power user, while the Y200 GT is for the practical enthusiast.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 is known to generate more heat than newer chipsets. While Honor likely implements thermal management solutions, prolonged gaming at maximum settings could lead to throttling, reducing sustained performance. The Y200 GT’s Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, being more efficient, is less prone to overheating.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the vivo Y200 GT compared to the 35W charging on the Honor X50 GT in real-world use?
The 80W charging on the Y200 GT will significantly reduce charging times. While the X50 GT will still charge your phone overnight, the Y200 GT can provide a substantial charge in a short period – 50% in 26 minutes – making it ideal for quick top-ups when you're short on time. Expect a full charge on the Y200 GT to be considerably faster.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 in the vivo Y200 GT powerful enough for demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 can run demanding games, but you may need to adjust graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. It won't deliver the same level of performance as the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 in the Honor X50 GT, but it's still capable of providing a playable gaming experience.
