The vivo Y200 (China) and Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Y200 focuses on a balance of features at a competitive price, while the K70 Ultra aims for near-flagship performance with its cutting-edge Dimensity 9300+ chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 9300+ chipset offers a substantial leap in processing power compared to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the vivo Y200, justifying the price difference for demanding users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2024, July 19 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 24 | Available. Released 2024, July 19 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.8 x 7.6/7.8/8.0 mm | 160.4 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187/188/190 g (6.60 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Scratch/drop-resistant glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | OLED, 68B colors, 144Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 4000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Immortalis-G720 MC12 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 8K@24/30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 20 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC 5 |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | No | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 24 min
Reverse wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 24 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Orange | Black, White, Violet, Green Championship Edition, Orange Championship Edition |
| Models | V2343A | 2407FRK8EC |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 330 EUR |
vivo Y200 (China)
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 80W fast charging
- Significantly less powerful processor
- Likely inferior display quality
- Potentially limited camera capabilities
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra
- Exceptional performance with Dimensity 9300+
- 120W ultra-fast charging
- Likely superior display and camera
- Higher price tag
- May run hotter under sustained load
- Potentially larger physical size
Display Comparison
While both devices utilize a 4nm process, the display specifications are not provided. However, given Xiaomi’s history with high refresh rate AMOLED panels, the K70 Ultra likely features a superior display in terms of peak brightness, color accuracy, and refresh rate. The Y200, positioned as a more budget-friendly option, may employ a less advanced panel, potentially impacting outdoor visibility and overall visual experience. Bezels are also likely to be slimmer on the K70 Ultra, reflecting its higher price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, it’s difficult to make a definitive comparison. However, Xiaomi typically equips its ‘Ultra’ models with competitive camera systems. The K70 Ultra likely features a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms than the Y200. The Y200’s camera is likely adequate for casual photography, but the K70 Ultra will excel in low-light conditions and offer greater detail and dynamic range. The presence or absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on each device would be a key differentiator, favoring the K70 Ultra if equipped.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ is a significant upgrade over the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 found in the vivo Y200. The Dimensity 9300+ boasts a 1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, alongside 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 cores, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720 efficiency cores, offering substantially higher CPU and GPU performance. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s 4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration is geared towards efficiency but lacks the raw power for intensive tasks. This translates to smoother gaming, faster app loading times, and improved multitasking on the K70 Ultra. The K70 Ultra will also benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70 Ultra’s 120W wired charging is a major advantage, promising a full charge in just 24 minutes. The vivo Y200’s 80W charging, while still fast, takes longer to reach 100%. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging speed of the K70 Ultra mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery. The K70 Ultra also supports PD3.0, offering wider compatibility with chargers and accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize a lower price point. It's ideal for users who primarily browse, use social media, and make calls. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra if you prefer a phone capable of handling demanding games, video editing, and multitasking without compromise, and are willing to invest in a more powerful processor and faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the vivo Y200 struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering, especially during intense combat sequences. The Dimensity 9300+ in the K70 Ultra will handle these games with ease at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the Redmi K70 Ultra compared to the 80W charging on the vivo Y200 in real-world use?
While both offer fast charging, the 120W on the K70 Ultra will significantly reduce charging time. Both claim 24 minutes to 100%, but the K70 Ultra is more likely to achieve this consistently. The Y200’s 80W charging will still provide a substantial boost in a short amount of time, but the K70 Ultra offers a more convenient and quicker top-up experience.
❓ Does the Dimensity 9300+ in the Redmi K70 Ultra generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 9300+ is a powerful chip and can generate heat under sustained load. However, Xiaomi typically implements effective thermal management solutions, including vapor chamber cooling, to mitigate overheating. While some throttling may occur during extended gaming, it’s unlikely to be severe enough to significantly impact performance. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 will generate less heat, but also offers considerably less performance.
