The vivo Y200 (China) and OnePlus Ace 3 Pro represent distinct approaches to the Android smartphone market. The Y200 aims for affordability with a capable mid-range chipset, while the Ace 3 Pro throws down the gauntlet with a flagship Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This comparison dissects the core differences, helping you determine which device best aligns with your performance needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a substantial leap in CPU and GPU capabilities over the Y200’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1. However, the vivo Y200 presents a compelling value proposition for budget-conscious users who don't require top-tier processing power.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May 20 | 2024, June 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May 24 | Available. Released 2024, July 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 74.8 x 7.6/7.8/8.0 mm | 163.3 x 75.3 x 8.7 / 8.9 / 9.0 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187/188/190 g (6.60 oz) | 207 g, 212 g, 225 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~90.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1300 nits (peak) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 800 nits (typ), 1600 nits (HBM), 4500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 14, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 24GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p, gyro-EIS | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.1, (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 50% in 24 min
Reverse wired | 100W wired, PD2.0, QC2, 52% in 15 min, 100% in 36 min |
| Type | 6000 mAh | 6100 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Silver, Orange | Gray, White, Green |
| Models | V2343A | PJX110 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 410 EUR |
vivo Y200 (China)
- More affordable price point
- Fast 80W wired charging
- Efficient Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 processor for everyday tasks
- Significantly lower performance compared to the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Likely less advanced camera system
- Limited future-proofing
OnePlus Ace 3 Pro
- Exceptional performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
- Ultra-fast 100W wired charging
- Superior camera capabilities (expected)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under sustained load
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
While display specifications are missing for the vivo Y200, the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro is expected to feature a high-refresh-rate AMOLED panel, common for its segment. The core difference lies in the processing power driving the visuals. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Adreno 750 GPU will deliver significantly smoother frame rates and higher graphical fidelity in games compared to the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1’s Adreno 710. The Ace 3 Pro’s panel likely boasts higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, enhancing both visual quality and battery efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the vivo Y200, a direct comparison is limited. However, OnePlus Ace series phones typically prioritize camera performance. The Ace 3 Pro is likely to feature a more advanced camera system with a larger main sensor, optical image stabilization (OIS), and sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) also contributes to superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. While the Y200 may offer acceptable image quality for casual use, the Ace 3 Pro is expected to deliver more detailed, dynamic, and versatile photos and videos.
Performance
The performance gap is the defining characteristic of this comparison. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a generational leap ahead of the vivo Y200’s Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm). The 8 Gen 3 features a 1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, alongside 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 cores and 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 cores, and 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520 cores, offering substantially higher single-core and multi-core performance. The Y200’s Octa-core configuration (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) is geared towards efficiency rather than outright speed. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Ace 3 Pro, particularly noticeable in graphically intensive applications and games.
Battery Life
Both phones utilize a 4nm process, contributing to improved power efficiency. However, the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s 100W wired charging significantly outperforms the vivo Y200’s 80W charging. The Ace 3 Pro can reach 52% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 36 minutes, minimizing downtime. While the Y200’s 80W charging is still fast (50% in 24 minutes), the Ace 3 Pro offers a more convenient and rapid charging experience. The actual battery capacity of both devices is unknown, but the faster charging of the Ace 3 Pro mitigates any potential disadvantage from a slightly smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 (China) if you need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks, social media, and light gaming, and prioritize affordability. You'll benefit from a decent processor and fast 80W charging without breaking the bank. Buy the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro if you demand uncompromising performance for demanding games, content creation, and multitasking, and are willing to invest in a flagship-level experience with the latest Snapdragon technology and even faster 100W charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the vivo Y200 struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is a mid-range chip and will likely require significant graphical settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potentially long loading times. The OnePlus Ace 3 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 will handle these games with ease at maximum settings.
❓ How much faster is the 100W charging on the OnePlus Ace 3 Pro compared to the 80W charging on the vivo Y200 in real-world use?
The 100W charging on the Ace 3 Pro provides a noticeable time saving. While the Y200 reaches 50% in 24 minutes, the Ace 3 Pro hits 52% in just 15 minutes. This difference is particularly impactful for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery before leaving the house.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the vivo Y200 sufficient for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and video streaming?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 is perfectly capable of handling everyday tasks smoothly. You won't experience any lag or slowdowns during typical smartphone usage. It's when you push the phone with demanding apps or games that its limitations become apparent.
