vivo Y200 (Asia) vs Motorola Edge 40 Neo: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing longevity, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice, offering a substantial 10:28h active use battery life. However, if minimizing charging time is paramount, the vivo Y200’s 80W charging, capable of 80% charge in just 30 minutes, makes it a strong contender.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | vivo Y200 (Asia) | Motorola Edge 40 Neo |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 - Asia | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Asia | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, November | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, November 22 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm or 8.0 mm | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4450 Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 613 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide) | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dynamic Black (Imperial Black), Titanium Silver, Dreamy Violet | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | - | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 280 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
vivo Y200 (Asia)
- 80W Fast Charging: Significantly reduces charging time.
- Snapdragon 4 Gen 2: Newer chipset with potential thermal advantages.
- 4nm Process: Potentially improved power efficiency.
- Battery Life Unknown: Lacks detailed battery performance data.
- Display Brightness Unspecified: Likely lower brightness than the Edge 40 Neo.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent Battery Life: 10:28h active use and 80h endurance rating.
- Bright Display: 1073 nits peak brightness for outdoor visibility.
- Fast Charging: 68W wired charging provides a quick boost.
- Dimensity 7030: 6nm process may run hotter under sustained load.
- Charging Speed: Slower than the vivo Y200's 80W charging.
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor use, where the Y200’s display brightness is not specified, likely falling short. While panel technology isn’t detailed for either, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness advantage suggests superior visibility in direct sunlight. Bezels and color accuracy are unknown for both, but the brightness difference is a clear win for Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the specifics are unknown. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality, serving primarily as a marketing feature. Image processing styles will likely differ, with vivo often favoring vibrant colors and Motorola aiming for more natural tones.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, has a slight clock speed advantage over the vivo Y200’s Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78). Both chips utilize a 6nm vs 4nm process, respectively, meaning the Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 *should* offer better thermal efficiency. However, the Dimensity 7030’s higher clock speeds could translate to faster performance in demanding tasks. The Y200’s 4nm node suggests potentially longer sustained performance under load, mitigating throttling. RAM specifications are missing for both, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo shines in battery performance, achieving an impressive 10:28h of active use and an endurance rating of 80 hours. The vivo Y200 lacks these detailed metrics, but compensates with significantly faster 80W wired charging, reaching 80% in just 30 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging takes 15 minutes to reach 50%. While the Y200’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance suggests a larger battery, prioritizing longevity over quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 (Asia) if you need the fastest possible charging speeds and prefer a newer Qualcomm chipset, even if it means slightly shorter battery life. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize all-day battery performance, a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and a more balanced overall package.