The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro and vivo Y200 4G represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco X6 Pro arrives with the powerful Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra, aiming for near-flagship performance, while the vivo Y200 4G focuses on a balance of features and efficiency with the Snapdragon 685. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset delivers significantly superior performance, making it ideal for gaming and demanding applications. While the vivo Y200 4G offers respectable battery charging speed, the Poco X6 Pro’s overall capabilities justify its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
vivo Y200 4G
- 80W fast charging offers quick top-ups.
- Snapdragon 685 provides good power efficiency.
- Potentially more affordable price point.
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Poco X6 Pro.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
- Camera specifications are unknown.
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra delivers exceptional performance.
- 1148 nits peak brightness for excellent outdoor visibility.
- Long battery life with 11:46h active use.
- 67W charging is slower to 100% than the vivo Y200 4G.
- Potentially higher price.
- Camera details are limited.
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits, compared to an unspecified brightness for the vivo Y200 4G. This higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While panel technology isn't specified for either, the brightness difference suggests the Poco X6 Pro utilizes a more advanced panel. Bezels and color accuracy are not specified, but the Poco X6 Pro’s higher resolution (likely FHD+) will contribute to a sharper image.
Camera Comparison
Camera details beyond 'Photo/Video' are limited for the Poco X6 Pro, but its market positioning suggests a focus on versatility. The vivo Y200 4G’s camera specifications are also unavailable, making a direct comparison difficult. However, given the trend in this price segment, it’s likely both phones feature a primary sensor paired with depth and macro lenses. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or dynamic range. Image processing styles will also differ, with Xiaomi typically favoring vibrant colors and the vivo often opting for a more natural look.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) features a core configuration of 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510, offering a significant leap in processing power over the vivo Y200 4G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (6nm). The Snapdragon 685, with its 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53 cores, is geared towards efficiency rather than raw speed. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Poco X6 Pro is expected to handle graphically intensive games and multitasking with ease, while the Y200 4G will likely struggle with demanding titles.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro achieves an impressive 11:46h active use score, indicating solid battery life despite its powerful processor. The vivo Y200 4G’s battery capacity is not specified, but its Snapdragon 685 chipset is more power-efficient. However, the Poco X6 Pro compensates with faster 67W wired charging (QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min) compared to the vivo Y200 4G’s 80W charging (80% in 30 min). While the vivo Y200 4G charges to 80% faster initially, the Poco X6 Pro reaches a full charge in a reasonable timeframe, and its overall battery endurance is likely comparable or better due to its optimized power management.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 4G if you prioritize a streamlined experience and fast 80W charging, and your primary use case revolves around everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light browsing. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you demand high performance for gaming, video editing, or multitasking, and are willing to trade a bit of battery life for a substantial boost in processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Poco X6 Pro's Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which generally leads to better thermal efficiency compared to older nodes. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the Poco X6 Pro is expected to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance. However, sustained high-intensity gaming will still likely result in some warming of the device.
❓ Is the 67W charging on the Poco X6 Pro significantly slower than the 80W charging on the vivo Y200 4G?
While the vivo Y200 4G reaches 80% charge in 30 minutes, the Poco X6 Pro completes a full charge in 45 minutes. The initial charging speed is slightly slower on the Poco, but the difference in time to reach 100% is not substantial. The Poco X6 Pro’s longer battery life also means you may not need to charge it as frequently.
❓ What kind of gaming performance can I expect from the vivo Y200 4G?
The Snapdragon 685 in the vivo Y200 4G is suitable for casual gaming and less demanding titles. However, graphically intensive games like PUBG or Genshin Impact will likely require significant compromises in graphics settings to achieve playable frame rates. Expect some stuttering and lag during more demanding gaming sessions.
