The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200 4G and Realme 12 Pro+ represent compelling options for users seeking a balance of features and affordability. While both devices aim to deliver a premium experience, they take different approaches, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and longer battery life, the Realme 12 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset, coupled with a measured 802 nits of brightness, offers a smoother experience and better visibility, despite the slightly slower 67W charging compared to the vivo Y200 4G’s 80W.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2024, January 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2024, January 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.5 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.36 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM), 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
64 MP, f/2.8, 71mm, (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.4, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 67W wired, 50% in 19 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green | Submarine Blue, Navigator Beige, Explorer Red |
| Models | - | RMX3840, RMX3841 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | $ 465.00 / £ 299.00 / € 344.26 / ₹ 28,400 |
vivo Y200 4G
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful Snapdragon 685 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Unknown battery capacity
Realme 12 Pro+
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset
- Brighter 802 nit display
- Excellent 13:24h battery life
- Slower 67W charging (compared to vivo)
- Potentially higher price
- No reverse wired charging
Display Comparison
The Realme 12 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 802 nits, which translates to superior visibility in direct sunlight. While the vivo Y200 4G’s display specifications are not provided, the Realme’s brightness advantage is substantial. The Realme 12 Pro+ likely utilizes a higher-quality panel, contributing to a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The lack of information on the Y200 4G’s panel type (AMOLED vs. LCD) and refresh rate makes a direct comparison difficult, but the Realme’s brightness alone is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for both devices beyond the presence of a main sensor, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 12 Pro+ is known for its 50MP main camera with OIS, suggesting a focus on image stabilization and low-light performance. The Y200 4G’s camera capabilities are less clear. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture on the Y200 4G makes it difficult to assess its image quality potential. It’s reasonable to assume the Realme 12 Pro+ will offer a more versatile and capable camera system, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Realme 12 Pro+ is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), featuring four Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz. This represents a significant step up from the vivo Y200 4G’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm), which utilizes older Cortex-A73 cores clocked at 2.8 GHz. While the Y200 4G’s cores have a higher clock speed, the newer architecture and smaller 4nm process of the 7s Gen 2 provide superior efficiency and sustained performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more enjoyable gaming experience on the Realme 12 Pro+. The 6nm process of the Snapdragon 685 in the Y200 4G will likely result in more thermal throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Realme 12 Pro+ demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving an active use score of 13 hours and 24 minutes. While the vivo Y200 4G’s battery capacity is unknown, the Realme’s endurance is a significant advantage. The Y200 4G compensates with 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes. The Realme 12 Pro+’s 67W charging takes 19 minutes to reach 50%. While the Y200 4G is faster to a certain point, the Realme’s superior battery life means you’ll need to charge it less frequently. The efficiency gains from the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 likely contribute to the Realme’s longer runtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 4G if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, calls, and light browsing. Its 80W charging will get you back up and running quickly. Buy the Realme 12 Pro+ if you value a more capable processor for gaming and demanding applications, a brighter display for outdoor use, and longer overall battery endurance, even if it means slightly slower charging speeds.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 685 in the vivo Y200 4G struggle with graphically demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 685 is a mid-range chipset and will likely struggle to deliver a consistently smooth experience in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. You'll likely need to lower graphics settings significantly, and even then, expect some frame drops. The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Realme 12 Pro+ is much better equipped to handle these titles.
❓ How much faster is the 80W charging on the vivo Y200 4G compared to the 67W charging on the Realme 12 Pro+ in real-world use?
While the vivo Y200 4G charges faster initially, reaching 80% in 30 minutes, the Realme 12 Pro+’s 67W charging isn’t drastically slower. The difference in charging time from 50% to 100% will be minimal. Given the Realme 12 Pro+'s superior battery life, you'll likely find yourself charging less often overall, mitigating the slower charging speed.
❓ Does the Realme 12 Pro+ support 5G connectivity, or is it limited to 4G like the vivo Y200 4G?
The Realme 12 Pro+ *does* support 5G connectivity, offering faster data speeds where available. The vivo Y200 4G, as its name suggests, is limited to 4G LTE. This is a significant consideration if you live in an area with 5G coverage and want to take advantage of faster mobile data.
