The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y200 4G and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options. The Y200 4G focuses on rapid charging and a familiar design, while the Edge 50 Fusion aims for a more balanced experience with a newer chipset and brighter display. This comparison dives deep into the specifications to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a vibrant display and smoother performance, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International variant) offers a significant performance uplift over the Y200 4G’s Snapdragon 685, and the 1322 nit peak brightness provides a superior viewing experience. However, the Y200 4G’s 80W charging is a compelling advantage.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, January | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188 g or 190 g (6.63 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 685 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 80W wired, 80% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Emerald Green | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | - | XT2429-1 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
vivo Y200 4G
- Extremely fast 80W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Familiar and reliable Snapdragon 685 platform
- Less powerful processor compared to the Edge 50 Fusion (International)
- Likely lower display brightness
- Potentially limited long-term software support
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- More powerful Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (International)
- Significantly brighter display (1322 nits)
- Excellent battery life (12:40h active use)
- Slower charging speed than the Y200 4G
- LATAM variant uses a less powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1322 nits. This is a substantial advantage over what we’d expect from the Y200 4G, making it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Y200 4G’s display specifications are not provided, the Edge 50 Fusion’s brightness level suggests a superior viewing experience. The Edge 50 Fusion’s panel likely benefits from its more modern manufacturing process, allowing for higher peak brightness without sacrificing efficiency. The lack of LTPO on either device means refresh rate scaling isn’t as dynamic, but the overall quality favors Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensors are lacking for both devices. However, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is likely to offer a more refined camera experience due to its more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) integrated within the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. This translates to better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely feature standard camera features, the Edge 50 Fusion’s chipset provides a foundation for more advanced computational photography capabilities. We can assume both phones will have a standard set of lenses, but the processing power of the Motorola will likely yield better results.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, in its international configuration, utilizes the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm). This is a clear step up from the vivo Y200 4G’s Snapdragon 685 (6nm). The 7s Gen 2 features Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.40 GHz, compared to the Y200 4G’s Cortex-A73 cores at 2.8 GHz. While the Y200 4G’s cores have a higher clock speed, the A78 architecture in the 7s Gen 2 offers superior instructions per clock (IPC), resulting in better overall performance. The 4nm process node of the 7s Gen 2 also contributes to improved thermal efficiency. However, the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, which narrows the performance gap, but still offers an advantage over the 685. The Y200 4G’s Snapdragon 685 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with demanding games or heavy multitasking.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion demonstrates impressive battery life, achieving 12 hours and 40 minutes of active use. While the vivo Y200 4G’s battery capacity is unknown, the Edge 50 Fusion’s endurance is a strong point. The Y200 4G compensates with its 80W wired charging, capable of reaching 80% charge in just 30 minutes. The Edge 50 Fusion’s 68W charging reaches 50% in 15 minutes. While the Y200 4G is faster overall, the Edge 50 Fusion’s battery life provides a longer buffer between charges. The faster charging of the Y200 4G is ideal for users who need a quick top-up, while the Edge 50 Fusion prioritizes all-day usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y200 4G if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are comfortable with a slightly less powerful processor. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and don’t heavily rely on demanding applications. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prefer a more modern chipset for smoother multitasking, a brighter and more enjoyable display, and longer sustained performance during gaming or video editing.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 685 in the vivo Y200 4G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile?
Yes, the Snapdragon 685 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding games like Genshin Impact or Call of Duty Mobile. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential stuttering, especially during intense scenes. The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 will provide a much smoother gaming experience.
❓ What is the real-world difference in charging time between the vivo Y200 4G's 80W charging and the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion's 68W charging?
The vivo Y200 4G can reach 80% charge in 30 minutes, while the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion reaches 50% in 15 minutes. While the Y200 4G is faster overall, the Edge 50 Fusion still provides a substantial charge in a short amount of time. The Y200 4G will fully charge faster, but the Edge 50 Fusion’s longer battery life means you may not need to charge as frequently.
❓ Is the LATAM version of the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion with the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 a significantly worse purchase than the International version?
Yes, the LATAM version with the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 represents a noticeable downgrade in performance compared to the International version with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2. While still a capable chipset, the 6 Gen 1 is less powerful and efficient. If possible, prioritize acquiring the International version for a superior user experience.
