The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y1s and Motorola Moto E7 Plus aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price. However, they take different approaches, primarily in their core processing power. This comparison dissects the key differences between the MediaTek Helio P35-powered Y1s and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460-equipped Moto E7 Plus, revealing which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus is the better choice. While the vivo Y1s offers a slightly newer architecture, the Snapdragon 460’s more efficient 11nm process and optimized Kryo cores provide a smoother experience, especially with multitasking and app loading. The 10W charging on the Moto E7 Plus is a significant advantage over the Y1s' unspecified charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 19, 28, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, November 26. Released 2020, November 26 | 2020, September 11. Released 2020, September 16 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 155.1 x 75.1 x 8.3 mm (6.11 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.2 mm (6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1520 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.22 inches, 96.6 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 10.5 | Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/1.8 | 8 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | - | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 4030 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aurora Blue, Olive Black | Navy Blue, Amber Bronze |
| Models | 1929 | XT2081-1, XT2081-2 |
| Price | About 80 EUR | About 350 EUR |
vivo Y1s
- Potentially slightly faster peak CPU clock speed.
- May offer a more compact form factor (depending on dimensions).
- Likely a competitive price point.
- Less efficient 12nm chipset.
- Older Cortex-A53 CPU architecture.
- Unspecified charging speed – likely slower than Moto E7 Plus.
Motorola Moto E7 Plus
- More efficient 11nm Snapdragon 460 chipset.
- Architecturally superior Kryo 240 CPU cores.
- 10W wired charging for faster top-ups.
- Potentially slightly lower peak CPU clock speed.
- May be slightly larger in size.
- Software updates may be less frequent.
Display Comparison
Neither device is expected to boast a high-end display. Details on panel technology (IPS vs. TFT) and resolution are missing for both, but given the price point, IPS LCDs are likely. The focus here is on the internal hardware, not display fidelity. Bezels are likely to be substantial on both, and color accuracy will be standard for this segment. The absence of high refresh rates or HDR support is expected.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, relying heavily on software processing. Both are expected to feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor. Details on sensor size and aperture are unavailable, but given the price point, they will be modest. The Moto E7 Plus may benefit from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially offering slightly better image quality in challenging lighting conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing gimmick and unlikely to deliver significant improvements in image quality.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm), featuring eight Kryo 240 cores clocked up to 1.8 GHz and 1.6 GHz. This 11nm process is more efficient than the 12nm process used in the vivo Y1s’ MediaTek Helio P35. The Helio P35’s octa-core configuration (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) boasts a higher peak clock speed, but the older Cortex-A53 architecture and less efficient manufacturing process mean it won’t translate to consistently faster real-world performance. The Snapdragon 460’s Kryo cores, while lower clocked, are architecturally more advanced, offering better sustained performance and power efficiency. This translates to smoother multitasking and less noticeable lag when switching between apps.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is a crucial factor in this segment. While the exact mAh rating for the vivo Y1s is not provided, it's likely in the 4000-5000 mAh range, similar to the Moto E7 Plus’s 5000 mAh battery. However, the Moto E7 Plus has a clear advantage with its 10W wired charging support. The vivo Y1s’ charging speed is unspecified, suggesting it may be slower, leading to longer charging times. The Snapdragon 460’s power efficiency further contributes to the Moto E7 Plus’s potential for longer battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y1s if you primarily need a phone for very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing, and are comfortable with potentially slower app loading times. Buy the Motorola Moto E7 Plus if you prefer a more responsive experience, occasionally play mobile games, or value faster charging for minimizing downtime. The Moto E7 Plus is the better all-rounder for most users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 460 in the Moto E7 Plus handle basic gaming like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 460 can handle PUBG Mobile at low to medium settings with reasonable frame rates. However, don't expect a flagship gaming experience. The Helio P35 in the Y1s will struggle more with demanding titles, requiring even lower settings and potentially experiencing more lag.
❓ How much of a difference will the 11nm vs 12nm process make in real-world battery life?
The 11nm process of the Snapdragon 460 is more power-efficient than the 12nm process of the Helio P35. This means the Moto E7 Plus will consume less power for the same tasks, resulting in potentially longer battery life, especially during sustained use like video playback or browsing.
❓ Is the difference in CPU clock speed (2.35 GHz vs 1.8 GHz) significant?
While the Helio P35 has a higher peak clock speed, the older Cortex-A53 architecture is less efficient than the Kryo 240 cores in the Snapdragon 460. This means the Snapdragon 460 can perform more work per clock cycle, often resulting in faster overall performance despite the lower clock speed.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging beyond 10W?
Neither phone supports fast charging beyond 10W. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus includes 10W charging, while the vivo Y1s' charging speed is unspecified, but is likely to be slower. Both phones are designed for budget-conscious consumers, and faster charging technologies are typically reserved for higher-end devices.
