The smartphone landscape is crowded with options, particularly in the budget and mid-range segments. The vivo Y19s, powered by the newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300, enters the arena to challenge the established Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro, a device known for its Helio G90T chipset and solid all-around performance. This comparison dives deep into the specifications and real-world implications of each device to determine which offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y19s emerges as the better choice. Its more efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a performance uplift over the Redmi Note 8 Pro’s 12nm Helio G90T, potentially leading to better sustained performance and thermal management, despite the Redmi Note 8 Pro's slightly faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, November 03 | 2019, August 29. Released 2019, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, November 03 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 161.4 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 700 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CC Helio G90T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Majestic Green, Titanium Silver | Black, Red, Blue, White, Deep Sea Blue, Midnight Blue, Electric Blue, Twilight Orange |
| Models | - | 2015105, M1906G7I, M1906G7G |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | 0.91 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.47 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -91.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1326:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 64dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 224759 (v7), 279355 (v8)
GeekBench: 6999 (v4.4), 1622 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y19s
- More efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Likely better thermal management
- Charging speed is slower (15W vs 18W)
- Display specifications are unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
- Brighter display (640 nits)
- Faster charging (18W)
- Proven track record and established user base
- Older 12nm Helio G90T chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Less efficient power consumption
Display Comparison
Both devices feature a contrast ratio of 1326:1, suggesting similar visual characteristics in terms of black levels. However, the Redmi Note 8 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 640 nits, a significant advantage for outdoor visibility. The vivo Y19s’ display specifications are currently unknown, making it difficult to assess its brightness and color accuracy. Without knowing the panel technology used in the Y19s, it’s hard to determine if it supports features like high refresh rates or HDR, which the Redmi Note 8 Pro lacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised with 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is impossible. The Redmi Note 8 Pro was known for its 64MP main sensor, a feature not mentioned for the Y19s. The presence of a high-resolution sensor on the Redmi Note 8 Pro suggests a potential advantage in detail capture, but image quality ultimately depends on software processing. The inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the Redmi Note 8 Pro (based on market knowledge) would also provide a benefit in low-light photography and video recording.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y19s utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 6300, fabricated on a 6nm process, while the Redmi Note 8 Pro features the Helio G90T built on a 12nm node. This process difference is crucial; the 6nm node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency. While the Helio G90T’s Cortex-A76 cores clock slightly higher (2.05 GHz vs 2.4 GHz on the Y19s), the Dimensity 6300’s architecture and efficiency gains likely translate to better sustained performance and reduced thermal throttling during demanding tasks like gaming. Both CPUs share the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores clocked at 2.0 GHz.
Battery Life
Both devices achieved an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Redmi Note 8 Pro supports 18W wired charging, slightly faster than the vivo Y19s’ 15W charging. This translates to a quicker 0-100% charge time for the Redmi Note 8 Pro. The Dimensity 6300’s improved efficiency in the Y19s could potentially offset the slower charging speed, resulting in similar real-world usage times despite the difference in charging wattage.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19s if you prioritize long-term performance and efficiency, and want a phone that will likely handle future software updates with more ease. Its newer chipset architecture provides a foundation for a smoother user experience. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro if you value a proven track record, a slightly brighter display (640 nits vs unknown for Y19s), and potentially faster charging speeds, but be aware of potential throttling issues under sustained load due to the older manufacturing process.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G90T in the Redmi Note 8 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact after extended play sessions?
The Helio G90T is capable of running Genshin Impact, but its 12nm process and thermal limitations mean it's prone to throttling under sustained load. Expect frame rate drops and potential overheating after 30-45 minutes of gameplay. The Dimensity 6300 in the Y19s, with its 6nm process, should offer more consistent performance over longer gaming sessions.
❓ How does the Dimensity 6300 handle multitasking compared to the Helio G90T?
The Dimensity 6300's architecture, combined with its more efficient manufacturing process, should provide a smoother multitasking experience. While both chipsets have the same number of cores, the Dimensity 6300's improved efficiency allows it to handle more background tasks without significant performance degradation.
❓ Is the 15W charging on the vivo Y19s significantly slower in real-world use?
While 18W is faster on paper, the Dimensity 6300's power efficiency means the Y19s may not require as much time plugged in to achieve a similar level of charge. The difference in charging time will likely be noticeable, but not dramatically so, especially considering the comparable battery endurance ratings.
