The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G and vivo Y19s Pro represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers seeking 5G connectivity. However, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, with Xiaomi leveraging Qualcomm’s Snapdragon platform and vivo opting for Unisoc’s Tiger T612. This comparison dives deep into the core differences to determine which device offers the best overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset delivers noticeably superior performance and 5G capabilities, offsetting the slightly slower 33W charging compared to the vivo Y19s Pro’s 44W. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G provides a more future-proof and responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, June 10 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, June 10 | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 44W wired, 40% in 30 min
Reverse wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 6000 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pearl Silver, Glossy Black, Glacier Blue | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | - | M2007J17C |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 370 EUR |
vivo Y19s Pro
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- Superior 5G connectivity and modem capabilities
- More efficient chipset for potentially better battery life
- Slower charging speed compared to the vivo Y19s Pro
- May be slightly more expensive depending on region
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Extremely fast 44W wired charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less powerful Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset
- Inferior 5G performance and modem
- May struggle with demanding apps and games
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display, but key differences exist. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (data not provided), the focus is on performance. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s chipset will likely handle display tasks more efficiently, potentially leading to smoother scrolling and animations. The absence of high refresh rate information suggests both are likely capped at 60Hz, making the chipset’s processing power more critical for perceived smoothness.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Snapdragon 750G’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is more advanced, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G will likely excel in low-light photography and video recording due to its superior processing capabilities. The absence of OIS information suggests neither phone features optical image stabilization.
Performance
The core differentiator lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm) significantly outperforms the vivo Y19s Pro’s Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm). The 8nm process node of the Snapdragon is more efficient, generating less heat and allowing for sustained performance. The Snapdragon 750G’s Kryo 570 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a substantial CPU performance advantage over the Tiger T612’s 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and A55 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience. The integrated 5G modem in the Snapdragon 750G is also more mature and likely offers wider band support.
Battery Life
The vivo Y19s Pro’s 44W charging is a clear advantage, promising a 40% charge in just 30 minutes. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G’s 33W charging takes 58 minutes for a full charge. However, battery life isn’t solely determined by charging speed. The Snapdragon 750G’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity (data not provided) in the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, resulting in comparable real-world usage. The more efficient chipset will draw less power during typical tasks.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19s Pro if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media and light browsing. The 44W charging will get you back up and running quickly. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you value smoother performance in demanding apps, better 5G connectivity, and a more capable chipset for gaming and future software updates. It’s the better all-rounder.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 750G’s 8nm process and Qualcomm’s thermal management technologies are designed to mitigate overheating. While some throttling is possible during extended, graphically intensive gaming, it’s less likely to be a significant issue compared to the 12nm Unisoc Tiger T612 in the Y19s Pro, which is more prone to thermal throttling.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compatible with all 5G networks?
The Snapdragon 750G supports a wide range of 5G bands, but compatibility depends on your carrier and region. It’s crucial to verify that the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G supports the 5G bands used by your mobile provider to ensure optimal 5G performance.
❓ How does the Unisoc Tiger T612 handle multitasking compared to the Snapdragon 750G?
The Snapdragon 750G’s more powerful CPU and GPU, coupled with potentially faster RAM (data not provided, but likely LPDDR4X), provide a significantly smoother multitasking experience. The Unisoc Tiger T612 may exhibit noticeable lag when switching between multiple apps or running demanding applications simultaneously.
