The sub-15,000 INR (approximately $180 USD) smartphone segment is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y19s GT, powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 6300, enters the fray challenging Samsung’s established Galaxy A12 (India) with its Exynos 850. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and future-proofing, the vivo Y19s GT is the better choice. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A12’s 8nm Exynos 850, despite both phones sharing the same 15W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, July 13 | 2021, August 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, July | Available. Released 2021, August 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 164 x 75.8 x 8.9 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | PLS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Exynos 850 (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, One UI 5.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), AF
5 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, RDS, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Jade Green, Crystal Purple | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | V2459 | SM-A127F, SM-A127F/DS |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 160 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.79 W/kg (head) |
vivo Y19s GT
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Improved thermal management due to 6nm process
- Less established brand recognition in some markets
- Potentially limited software update support
Samsung Galaxy A12 (India)
- Strong brand recognition and established service network
- Generally reliable software experience
- Wider availability in certain regions
- Older and less efficient Exynos 850 chipset
- Potentially slower app launch speeds
- Less capable ISP for camera performance
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. The key difference lies under the hood. While specific display specs are unavailable, the Y19s GT benefits from the more modern chipset’s image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to slightly better image processing for display output. The A12’s display, while adequate, is likely to exhibit lower color accuracy and contrast compared to what the Dimensity 6300 can drive.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the Dimensity 6300’s ISP is likely more advanced than the one paired with the Exynos 850. This translates to better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. The A12 often relies heavily on software processing, which can sometimes result in over-sharpened images. It’s reasonable to assume the Y19s GT will deliver more natural-looking photos. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests these are largely marketing features and offer limited practical benefit.
Performance
The performance gap is the most significant differentiator. The vivo Y19s GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) features a more modern CPU architecture – two Cortex-A76 cores alongside six Cortex-A55 cores – compared to the Samsung Galaxy A12’s Exynos 850 (8nm) which utilizes eight Cortex-A55 cores. The A76 cores in the Y19s GT provide a substantial boost in single-core performance, crucial for app launch speeds and general responsiveness. The 6nm fabrication process further enhances efficiency, potentially leading to better thermal management and sustained performance during prolonged use. The Exynos 850, while capable, is showing its age and will struggle with more demanding tasks.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 15W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds – expect around 2-2.5 hours for a full charge. Battery capacity is not specified, but given the segment, both likely hover around the 5000mAh mark. The Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process efficiency gives the Y19s GT a slight edge in battery life, as it consumes less power during typical usage. This translates to potentially longer screen-on time and reduced standby drain.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19s GT if you need a phone that feels snappier in everyday tasks and offers better potential for handling demanding apps and light gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A12 (India) if you prioritize brand recognition and a potentially wider service network, and your usage is primarily focused on basic communication and light social media.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 850 in the Galaxy A12 struggle with multitasking?
Yes, the Exynos 850, with its all-Cortex-A55 core configuration, can exhibit noticeable slowdowns when handling multiple apps simultaneously. Frequent app switching or running demanding applications in the background will likely result in lag and reduced responsiveness. The Y19s GT’s Dimensity 6300, with its A76 cores, handles multitasking far more efficiently.
❓ Is the 15W charging on either phone considered slow by today's standards?
Yes, 15W charging is relatively slow compared to the 25W, 33W, or even 65W charging found on many modern smartphones. Expect approximately 2-2.5 hours to fully charge either device from 0%. While not ideal, it's a common compromise in this price segment.
❓ Will the vivo Y19s GT receive regular software updates?
vivo's software update track record is inconsistent. While they have improved in recent years, the Y19s GT, being a budget device, may not receive the same level of long-term support as Samsung's Galaxy A series. Expect at least one major Android update, but beyond that, updates may be limited to security patches.
❓ How does the Dimensity 6300 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
The Dimensity 6300 can run PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with acceptable frame rates. However, pushing the graphics settings to high may result in noticeable frame drops and stuttering. The Exynos 850 will likely struggle even at medium settings, requiring significant compromises in visual quality for a playable experience.
