The smartphone market is flooded with options, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G and vivo Y19s represent compelling choices for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G aims to deliver future-proof connectivity with its 5G capabilities and a more powerful chipset, while the vivo Y19s prioritizes longevity with a focus on battery endurance and efficient processing. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing future-proofing and faster data speeds, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 750G chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift and 5G connectivity. However, users who value exceptional battery life and are less concerned with 5G will find the vivo Y19s a more suitable option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 41, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 15 | 2020, November 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Available. Released 2020, December 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 165.4 x 76.8 x 9 mm (6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR10, 120Hz, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 10, MIUI 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired
Reverse wired | 33W wired, 100% in 58 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4820 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pearl Silver, Glossy Black, Glacier Blue | Gray, Blue, Red/Mint |
| Models | V2419 | M2007J17C |
| Price | € 101.15 / £ 149.90 | About 370 EUR |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 54:28h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
vivo Y19s 4G
- Faster 5G connectivity for quicker data speeds
- More powerful Snapdragon 750G chipset for smoother performance
- 33W fast charging for rapid power-ups
- Likely superior camera performance due to a better ISP
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to the vivo Y19s
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y19s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G
- Exceptional battery life (54:28h endurance)
- More power-efficient Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset
- Potentially lower price point
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Lacks 5G connectivity
- Slower 15W charging
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G's positioning, it likely features a higher refresh rate panel (90Hz or 120Hz) compared to the Y19s, offering smoother scrolling and animations. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G's chipset also has a more powerful ISP, potentially leading to better image processing from the front camera. The Y19s, being a more budget-focused device, likely utilizes a standard 60Hz panel.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G, being a 'Pro' model, likely features a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing capabilities thanks to the Snapdragon 750G's ISP. The Unisoc T612 in the Y19s is capable, but will likely result in less dynamic range and detail in challenging lighting conditions. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G's ISP will also likely support more advanced features like 4K video recording, which may be absent on the Y19s.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G boasts the Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8nm) versus the vivo Y19s' Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm). The Snapdragon 750G, built on a smaller 8nm process, offers superior power efficiency and performance. Its Kryo 570 cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, outperform the Cortex-A75 cores (1.8 GHz) in the Unisoc T612 in both single-core and multi-core tasks. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a better gaming experience on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G. The 5G modem within the Snapdragon 750G is a significant advantage for users in areas with 5G coverage.
Battery Life
The vivo Y19s shines in battery endurance, achieving a reported 54:28h of usage. While the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G's battery capacity isn't specified, the Snapdragon 750G's 8nm process and the Redmi's 33W fast charging (100% in 58 minutes) offer a compelling counterpoint. The Y19s' 15W charging is significantly slower. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G's faster charging mitigates the potential impact of a slightly smaller battery, allowing for quicker top-ups when needed. The Y19s is the clear winner for users prioritizing maximum uptime between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19s if you need a phone that can reliably last a full day – and potentially beyond – on a single charge, and your network doesn't yet have widespread 5G coverage. You'll benefit from a more efficient processor and a longer-lasting battery. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G if you prioritize faster download and upload speeds, smoother multitasking, and the potential for better gaming performance, and you have access to a 5G network.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the vivo Y19s struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc Tiger T612 is a capable processor for everyday tasks, but it will likely require lower graphics settings and frame rates in demanding games like PUBG Mobile to maintain a smooth experience. The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G's Snapdragon 750G offers a more comfortable gaming experience with higher settings and more consistent frame rates.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G compared to the 15W charging on the vivo Y19s in real-world use?
The Redmi Note 9 Pro 5G can charge from 0-100% in approximately 58 minutes. The vivo Y19s, with its 15W charging, will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 2 hours. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the vivo Y19s a major drawback if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
If 5G coverage is sparse or unavailable in your location, the lack of 5G on the vivo Y19s is not a significant drawback. You'll still benefit from the phone's excellent battery life and efficient performance on 4G networks.
