The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y19s 4G and Huawei P smart 2021 represent compelling options for users prioritizing affordability. However, they take different approaches to achieving value. The Y19s focuses on maximizing battery life with a newer chipset, while the P smart 2021 offers faster charging and a measured brighter display. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and a modern chipset, the vivo Y19s 4G emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer endurance rating (54:28h vs 119h, noting the P smart's rating is older) and more efficient Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset outweigh the Huawei P smart 2021’s faster charging and slightly brighter screen.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 15 | 2020, September 28. Released 2020, September 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 165.8 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.53 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) | 165.7 x 76.9 x 9.3 mm (6.52 x 3.03 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 206 g (7.27 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Mohs level 4 | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1608 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~264 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.68 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 1000 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A73 & 4x1.7 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) | Kirin 710A (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| OS | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 10, EMUI 10.1, no Google Play Services |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.4, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.95", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, built-in antenna |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired
Reverse wired | 22.5W wired, 46% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Pearl Silver, Glossy Black, Glacier Blue | Crush Green, Blush Gold, Midnight Black |
| Models | V2419 | PPA-LX1, PPA-LX2 |
| Price | € 101.15 / £ 149.90 | About 230 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1252:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.8 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 169253 (v8)
GeekBench: 1334 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 7fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
| EU LABEL |
|---|
| Battery | 54:28h endurance, 1000 cycles | - |
| Energy | Class A | - |
| Free fall | Class B (180 falls) | - |
| Repairability | Class B | - |
vivo Y19s 4G
- Exceptional battery life (54:28h endurance)
- More efficient Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset (12nm)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Display specifications are unknown
- Slower charging speed (15W)
Huawei P smart 2021
- Faster charging (22.5W, 46% in 30 min)
- Brighter display (442 nits)
- Higher contrast ratio (1252:1)
- Significantly lower battery endurance (119h)
- Older, less efficient Kirin 710A chipset (14nm)
Display Comparison
The Huawei P smart 2021 boasts a measured peak brightness of 442 nits and a contrast ratio of 1252:1, suggesting a reasonably viewable experience, particularly indoors. However, the vivo Y19s 4G’s display specifications are not provided, leaving its visual performance an unknown. The P smart’s contrast ratio, while decent, doesn’t indicate a particularly high-end panel. The lack of information on the Y19s’ panel technology (IPS, TFT) makes a direct comparison difficult, but the P smart’s brightness is a clear advantage based on available data.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed camera specifications are absent. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, a meaningful comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on many phones in this segment is likely, but its utility is questionable. The absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device suggests reliance on software stabilization, which is less effective in low-light conditions. Therefore, camera performance remains a significant unknown.
Performance
The vivo Y19s 4G utilizes the Unisoc Tiger T612 (12nm), an octa-core processor with a mix of Cortex-A75 and A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This represents a more modern architecture than the Huawei P smart 2021’s Kirin 710A (14nm), which features Cortex-A73 and A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz and 1.7 GHz respectively. While the Kirin 710A’s higher clock speeds might offer a slight edge in single-core tasks, the T612’s newer architecture and smaller 12nm process node should translate to better power efficiency and sustained performance under load. The Y19s benefits from a more recent chipset design, potentially offering improved graphics performance and future software compatibility.
Battery Life
The vivo Y19s 4G truly shines in battery endurance, achieving a remarkable 54:28h rating. This is a substantial improvement over the Huawei P smart 2021’s 119h rating, despite the P smart’s larger battery capacity (not specified). The Unisoc Tiger T612’s 12nm process clearly contributes to this efficiency. While the P smart 2021 offers faster 22.5W charging (46% in 30 minutes), the Y19s’ 15W charging is adequate, and the significantly longer battery life minimizes the need for frequent top-ups. The Y19s also offers reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the P smart.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19s 4G if you need exceptional battery life and a chipset built on a more modern 12nm process, ensuring better efficiency and potentially longer software support. Buy the Huawei P smart 2021 if you prioritize faster charging speeds (22.5W vs 15W) and a display with a measured 442 nits of brightness, even if it comes at the cost of significantly reduced battery endurance and an older, less efficient 14nm chipset.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the vivo Y19s 4G struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Unisoc Tiger T612 isn't a flagship-level processor, it's capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings. The 12nm process helps with thermal throttling, but extended gaming sessions may result in some frame drops. Optimizing in-game settings is recommended for a smoother experience.
❓ How does the older 14nm Kirin 710A in the Huawei P smart 2021 affect long-term performance and battery health?
The 14nm Kirin 710A is less power-efficient than the 12nm Unisoc T612. This translates to shorter battery life and potentially more heat generation during intensive tasks. Over time, this can contribute to faster battery degradation compared to the vivo Y19s 4G.
❓ Is the 46% charge in 30 minutes on the Huawei P smart 2021 enough to quickly top up the battery during a busy day?
While 46% in 30 minutes is a respectable charging speed, the Huawei P smart 2021’s significantly shorter overall battery life means you’ll likely need to utilize this feature more often than with the vivo Y19s 4G, which offers all-day endurance.
