The vivo Y19 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a solid experience without breaking the bank, they approach this goal with different chipsets and feature sets. The Y19 boasts a newer Mediatek Dimensity 6300, while the Redmi Note 8 Pro relies on the older, but still capable, Helio G90T. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y19 emerges as the better choice. Its more efficient 6nm Dimensity 6300 chipset offers a performance edge and improved thermal management over the Redmi Note 8 Pro’s 12nm Helio G90T, despite the slightly slower charging. The Redmi Note 8 Pro remains a viable option if found at a significantly lower price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 01 | 2019, August 29. Released 2019, September 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 01 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 161.4 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 200 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CC Helio G90T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Majestic Green | Black, Red, Blue, White, Deep Sea Blue, Midnight Blue, Electric Blue, Twilight Orange |
| Models | V2432 | 2015105, M1906G7I, M1906G7G |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 220 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.47 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -91.9dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1326:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 64dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 82dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 224759 (v7), 279355 (v8)
GeekBench: 6999 (v4.4), 1622 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y19
- More efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Potentially better sustained performance
- Modern chipset architecture for future updates
- Slower 15W charging
- Camera specifications are unknown
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
- Excellent 114-hour endurance rating
- Faster 18W charging
- Potentially lower price point
- Less efficient Helio G90T chipset
- Potential for thermal throttling
- Older chipset architecture
Display Comparison
Both phones offer a similar display experience, with the Redmi Note 8 Pro listing a measured peak brightness of 640 nits and a 1326:1 contrast ratio. The vivo Y19’s display specifications are not provided, but given its market positioning, it’s likely comparable. The Redmi Note 8 Pro’s contrast ratio is a nominal value, suggesting it may vary in real-world use. Neither phone is expected to feature high refresh rate panels or advanced display technologies like LTPO, focusing instead on affordability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or image processing details, a direct comparison is difficult. The Redmi Note 8 Pro was known for its 64MP main sensor, a feature not mentioned for the Y19. However, megapixels aren’t everything; the Dimensity 6300’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) may offer improved image processing algorithms. The absence of details suggests both phones target casual photography rather than enthusiast-level image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y19’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a more efficient manufacturing process than the Redmi Note 8 Pro’s Helio G90T (12nm). This translates to better thermal efficiency and potentially longer sustained performance under load. While the Helio G90T’s Cortex-A76 cores clock slightly higher at 2.05 GHz versus the Y19’s 2.4 GHz, the Dimensity 6300’s architecture and process node give it an advantage. The Y19’s CPU configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is optimized for both performance and efficiency, while the Redmi Note 8 Pro’s (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) may exhibit more throttling during extended gaming sessions.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 8 Pro boasts an impressive endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The vivo Y19’s battery capacity is not specified, but its 15W wired charging is slower than the Redmi Note 8 Pro’s 18W. However, the Dimensity 6300’s superior efficiency may partially offset the charging speed difference, potentially resulting in comparable real-world battery life despite the slower charging rate. The 114-hour rating for the Redmi Note 8 Pro is a significant advantage for users who prioritize longevity between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19 if you prioritize sustained performance for gaming and multitasking, and value a more modern chipset architecture for future software support. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro if you find it at a substantial discount and are primarily focused on basic smartphone tasks, and the 114-hour endurance rating is a key factor for your usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G90T in the Redmi Note 8 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Helio G90T is capable of running these games, but it's prone to thermal throttling. Expect frame rate drops and reduced performance during extended gaming sessions. The Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y19 is expected to offer more consistent performance due to its superior thermal efficiency.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the vivo Y19 with its 15W charger?
While a precise time isn't available, expect a full charge to take approximately 2.5 to 3.5 hours, depending on battery capacity. The Redmi Note 8 Pro’s 18W charging will be faster, potentially completing a full charge in around 2 to 2.5 hours.
❓ Is the Redmi Note 8 Pro still a good buy in 2024, considering its age?
If you can find the Redmi Note 8 Pro at a significantly discounted price, it remains a viable option for basic smartphone tasks. However, the vivo Y19 offers a more modern chipset and potentially better long-term software support.
