The smartphone landscape is littered with options, but finding the right balance of performance and price can be challenging. We pit the newer vivo Y19, powered by a Mediatek Dimensity 6300, against the established Nokia 7.2, featuring the older Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, to determine which device offers the best value in today’s market. This comparison focuses on real-world implications of the hardware differences, not just raw specifications.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the vivo Y19 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset delivers a significant performance uplift over the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2, despite the Nokia’s slightly brighter display. While both offer similar battery endurance, the Y19’s faster charging is a welcome addition.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 01 | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 01 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Majestic Green | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | V2432 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y19
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More efficient chipset for better battery life under load
- Faster 15W charging for quicker top-ups
- Display brightness and color accuracy are unknown
- Brand recognition may be lower than Nokia
Nokia 7.2
- Brighter display (585 nits measured)
- Clean Android experience and software update commitment
- Established brand reputation for reliability
- Outdated Snapdragon 660 chipset limits performance
- Slower 10W charging
- Less efficient chipset leads to more heat
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a measured peak brightness of 585 nits and a 1342:1 contrast ratio, providing a visually pleasing experience, particularly outdoors. However, the vivo Y19, while lacking specific brightness data, benefits from a more modern panel likely offering improved color accuracy and efficiency. The contrast ratio is likely similar, but the older Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 will struggle to drive graphically intensive applications at the same frame rates as the Y19, diminishing the benefit of the brighter screen in demanding scenarios.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but specifics are lacking. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the newer chipset in the vivo Y19 likely enables more advanced image processing algorithms, potentially leading to better dynamic range and low-light performance. The Nokia 7.2’s camera system, while potentially competent, is limited by the processing power of the Snapdragon 660. We can assume both phones will have similar limitations with any secondary, low-resolution sensors.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y19’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Nokia 7.2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm). The Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores, clocked at 2.4 GHz, offer significantly higher single-core performance than the Snapdragon 660’s Kryo 260 Gold cores at 2.2 GHz. Furthermore, the 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Y19 will maintain higher performance for longer periods, especially in gaming and multitasking. The Snapdragon 660, while still capable, is showing its age.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 69 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the vivo Y19’s 15W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging. This translates to significantly faster charging times, reducing downtime and improving overall usability. While both will likely last a full day for moderate users, the Y19 offers the convenience of quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19 if you need a phone capable of handling modern apps and light gaming with ease, and value faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who want a responsive experience without breaking the bank. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prioritize a slightly brighter display and prefer a brand known for its clean Android experience and software update commitment, understanding you’ll be sacrificing significant processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y19 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Dimensity 6300’s Cortex-A76 cores and improved GPU performance compared to the Snapdragon 660 will allow for a smoother gaming experience in PUBG Mobile, likely at medium to high settings. The 6nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling, maintaining performance for longer sessions.
❓ Is the Nokia 7.2 still a good option for basic everyday tasks like calling, texting, and browsing?
Absolutely. The Snapdragon 660 is still capable of handling basic tasks without issue. However, you may notice slower app loading times and occasional stutters when multitasking compared to the vivo Y19. The Nokia 7.2 excels if your primary needs are communication and light web browsing.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the vivo Y19 compared to the Nokia 7.2?
The vivo Y19’s 15W charging is 50% faster than the Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging. While exact 0-100% times are unavailable, you can expect a significantly reduced charging time with the Y19, allowing you to get back to using your phone quicker.
