The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y19 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent compelling options for users prioritizing affordability. However, they approach this segment with different philosophies: the Y19 leverages a newer, more efficient chipset, while the G8 Plus relies on established endurance and a well-regarded display. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y19 emerges as the stronger choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset, built on a 6nm process, offers a significant performance advantage over the Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus, translating to smoother multitasking and gaming. While both offer similar 15W charging and battery endurance ratings, the Y19’s modern architecture provides a future-proofed foundation.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, May 01 | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May 01 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 167.3 x 77 x 8.2 mm (6.59 x 3.03 x 0.32 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.02 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 570 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 15, Funtouch 15 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2, (wide) | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5500 mAh | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Titanium Silver, Majestic Green | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | V2432 | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 50 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y19
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 6300 chipset
- Modern CPU architecture for smoother performance
- Potential for improved image processing
- Display specifications currently unknown
- Camera details are lacking
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Proven battery life with 87-hour endurance rating
- Bright and well-calibrated display (581 nits)
- Established brand reputation for reliability
- Older Snapdragon 665 chipset is less efficient
- Slower performance compared to the Y19
- 15W charging is relatively slow
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus boasts a display capable of reaching 581 nits of peak brightness, paired with a 1505:1 contrast ratio. While respectable, this is a nominal contrast ratio, and real-world performance may vary. The vivo Y19’s display specifications are currently unavailable, but given its market positioning, it’s unlikely to surpass the G8 Plus in peak brightness. However, the G8 Plus’s LCD panel technology lacks the potential for features like variable refresh rates found in some competing devices. The G8 Plus’s contrast ratio, while seemingly high, doesn’t necessarily translate to vibrant colors without further calibration.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having a 'Photo' camera, which is unhelpful. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the market segment suggests both will rely on budget-friendly sensors. The G8 Plus’s camera system likely prioritizes software processing to enhance image quality, while the Y19 may benefit from the improved ISP capabilities of the Dimensity 6300. The absence of information regarding OIS or aperture sizes makes a definitive assessment impossible, but the Y19’s newer chipset could offer improved image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y19’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) utilizes a more modern architecture – Cortex-A76 cores – compared to the Motorola Moto G8 Plus’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm). The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 is significantly more efficient, leading to better thermal management and sustained performance. The Y19’s CPU configuration (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) provides a performance uplift over the G8 Plus’s (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver). This translates to faster app loading times and a smoother user experience, particularly noticeable in multitasking and demanding applications. The Snapdragon 665, while capable, is showing its age.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y19 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus share an endurance rating of 87 hours and 15W wired charging. This suggests comparable battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the Dimensity 6300’s superior power efficiency in the Y19 could translate to slightly longer real-world usage, despite the identical endurance rating. The 15W charging speed is relatively slow by today’s standards, meaning a full charge will take a considerable amount of time on both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19 if you need a phone capable of handling modern apps and light gaming without significant lag, and value a more efficient processor for longer-term performance. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you prioritize a proven track record of battery life and a well-calibrated display, and your usage primarily revolves around basic communication and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the vivo Y19 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Dimensity 6300 is a significant step up from the Snapdragon 665. While it won't deliver flagship-level gaming performance, it should be capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium settings with a stable frame rate. The 6nm process also helps mitigate thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions.
❓ Is the 15W charging speed on both phones sufficient for daily use?
15W charging is relatively slow compared to modern standards. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours. While sufficient for overnight charging, it's not ideal for quick top-ups. The similar battery endurance ratings mean neither phone offers a significant advantage in charging time.
❓ How does the Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus perform with multitasking?
The Snapdragon 665 is adequate for basic multitasking, such as switching between messaging apps and web browsing. However, it may struggle with numerous apps open simultaneously or resource-intensive applications. The vivo Y19’s Dimensity 6300 will provide a noticeably smoother multitasking experience.
