The vivo Y19 (2019) and Oppo A9 (2020) represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price point, they diverge significantly in their core hardware. This comparison dissects the differences between the MediaTek Helio P65-powered vivo Y19 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665-equipped Oppo A9, focusing on performance, battery endurance, and overall user experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and longer battery life, the Oppo A9 (2020) emerges as the better choice. Its Snapdragon 665 chipset, coupled with a reported 69-hour endurance rating, offers a more consistent experience than the vivo Y19's Helio P65, despite the latter's faster 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 01. Released 2019, November | 2019, September 10. Released 2019, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 163.6 x 75.6 x 9.1 mm (6.44 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10, ColorOS 7.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.25", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF
2 MP, f/2.4, 1/5.0", 1.75µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 12 MP, f/2.0, 1/2.8", 1.25µm, PDAF, Laser AF
12 MP B/W, f/2.0, 1/2.9", 1.25µm, PDAF, Laser AF |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 10W wired
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magnetic Black, Spring White | Marine Green, Space Purple, Vanilla Mint |
| Models | 1915 | CPH1937, CPH1939, CPH1941 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) | 0.87 W/kg (head) 1.10 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.41 W/kg (head) 1.45 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 68dB / Noise 70dB / Ring 86dB
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 209779 (v7)
GeekBench: 6629 (v4.4)
GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y19 (2019)
- Faster 18W wired charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance (bursts)
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
- Potentially more thermal throttling under sustained load
Oppo A9 (2020)
- More efficient 11nm Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Superior battery endurance (69h rating)
- Smoother sustained performance
- Slower 10W wired charging
- Potentially less vibrant display (speculation)
- Limited camera details available
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. However, detailed display specs (resolution, brightness, color gamut) are unavailable. The focus here is on internal components, as display quality is unlikely to be a major differentiator. Bezels are expected to be relatively substantial on both models, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications beyond the presence of a camera on the Oppo A9 are lacking. However, given the market segment, both phones likely feature a primary camera alongside depth and macro sensors. The usefulness of the 2MP macro sensors on both devices is questionable. Without knowing sensor sizes or apertures, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. Image processing will likely be a key differentiator, with Oppo’s software often prioritizing vibrant colors and enhanced details, while vivo tends towards a more natural look. The absence of OIS on either device suggests image stabilization will rely heavily on software algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A9’s Snapdragon 665 (11nm) benefits from a more efficient manufacturing process compared to the vivo Y19’s Helio P65 (12nm). While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 665 utilizes Qualcomm’s Kryo cores, offering a more refined architecture. The Y19’s Cortex-A75 cores provide a burst of speed, but the A9’s sustained performance will likely be superior due to the more efficient process node. This translates to smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming performance, especially in longer sessions. The Snapdragon 665’s Adreno 610 GPU is also generally considered more capable than the Helio P65’s IMG GE8320.
Battery Life
The Oppo A9 (2020) clearly wins in battery endurance, boasting a reported 69-hour rating. While the vivo Y19 offers faster 18W wired charging compared to the A9’s 10W, the A9’s superior battery efficiency and larger capacity (likely, though not specified) offset this advantage. The Y19’s 18W charging will deliver a quicker 0-100% charge, but the A9 will likely last significantly longer between charges. Both phones support reverse wired charging, offering a convenient way to top up accessories, but the charging speed will be limited by the 10W output of the A9 and 5W of the Y19.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19 (2019) if you prioritize faster charging speeds and frequently need to top up your phone quickly, even if it means slightly shorter battery life. Buy the Oppo A9 (2020) if you value consistent performance throughout the day, extended battery endurance, and a more efficient chipset for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 665 in the Oppo A9 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a smooth experience. While not a gaming powerhouse, the 665’s efficiency prevents significant overheating and throttling during moderate gaming sessions, offering a more consistent frame rate than the Helio P65 might achieve.
❓ How much faster is the 18W charging on the vivo Y19 compared to the 10W charging on the Oppo A9?
The 18W charging on the vivo Y19 will significantly reduce charging times. While exact figures are unavailable, expect a 0-100% charge to take approximately 2-3 hours on the Y19, compared to 3-4 hours on the A9. However, this speed advantage is offset by the A9’s superior battery endurance, meaning you’ll need to charge it less frequently.
❓ Does the Oppo A9 support fast charging with a different charger?
While the Oppo A9 ships with a 10W charger, it *may* support faster charging with a compatible PD (Power Delivery) charger. However, Oppo doesn't officially advertise support for higher wattage charging, and compatibility isn't guaranteed. Using a non-certified charger could potentially damage the battery.
