Released in 2019, both the vivo Y19 and Nokia 7.2 represent attempts to deliver a compelling smartphone experience at a competitive price point. While both phones share a similar target audience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in their chipsets and display characteristics. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and a brighter, more visible display, the Nokia 7.2 emerges as the better choice. While the vivo Y19 offers 18W charging, the Snapdragon 660’s more efficient architecture and superior display brightness outweigh this advantage, providing a smoother and more enjoyable user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 01. Released 2019, November | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magnetic Black, Spring White | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | 1915 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y19 (2019)
- Faster 18W charging for quicker top-ups.
- Potentially lower initial purchase price.
- More modern 12nm chipset fabrication.
- Helio P65 chipset generally offers lower performance than Snapdragon 660.
- Display brightness likely inferior to Nokia 7.2.
Nokia 7.2
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility.
- More efficient Snapdragon 660 chipset for smoother performance.
- Potentially better camera image processing.
- Slower 10W charging.
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y19.
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a significantly more impressive display, achieving a measured peak brightness of 585 nits compared to an unstated value for the vivo Y19. Both share a 1342:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels, but the higher brightness of the Nokia 7.2 translates to better visibility outdoors and in brightly lit environments. While neither phone utilizes advanced panel technology like LTPO, the Nokia 7.2’s superior brightness makes it the clear winner for media consumption and general usability.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given Nokia’s historical emphasis on camera quality, it’s reasonable to assume the Nokia 7.2 benefits from more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The absence of details regarding sensor size and aperture on both devices makes a detailed comparison impossible, but the Nokia 7.2’s brand reputation suggests a slight advantage in image quality.
Performance
The core difference between these devices lies in their chipsets. The Nokia 7.2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660, fabricated on a 14nm process, features a Kryo 260 CPU configuration with 4x2.2 GHz Gold cores and 4x1.8 GHz Silver cores. This contrasts with the vivo Y19’s MediaTek Helio P65 (12nm), utilizing a big.LITTLE architecture with 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Despite the Helio P65’s smaller node size, the Snapdragon 660’s more refined architecture and higher clock speeds on its performance cores generally result in smoother multitasking and more responsive application loading. The 14nm process, while older, is well-optimized for the Snapdragon 660, providing a good balance of performance and efficiency.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y19 and Nokia 7.2 achieve an endurance rating of 69 hours, indicating similar overall battery life despite differing battery capacities (unspecified). However, the vivo Y19’s 18W wired charging significantly outperforms the Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging. This means the Y19 can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime. While both offer comparable longevity, the Y19’s faster charging is a practical advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19 (2019) if you need faster charging speeds and prioritize a lower initial cost, accepting potential performance limitations in demanding applications. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you prefer a brighter, more color-accurate display and a more capable chipset for everyday tasks and light multitasking, even if it means slower charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Helio P65 in the vivo Y19 capable of running demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
While the Helio P65 can run PUBG Mobile, expect to make compromises in graphics settings. The Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 will provide a smoother experience at higher settings due to its more powerful CPU and GPU. Frame rate stability will likely be better on the Nokia 7.2 during extended gaming sessions.
❓ How does the charging speed difference impact daily use between the vivo Y19 and Nokia 7.2?
The vivo Y19’s 18W charging can add a significant percentage of battery life in a short amount of time – roughly 30% in 30 minutes. The Nokia 7.2’s 10W charging will take considerably longer to achieve the same level of charge, making the Y19 more convenient for users who need quick top-ups throughout the day.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2's display support HDR content?
No, the Nokia 7.2’s display does not support HDR content. While it boasts a high contrast ratio and brightness, it lacks the necessary certifications and color gamut coverage to accurately reproduce HDR video. It will display HDR content, but without the dynamic range benefits.
