The vivo Y19 (2019) and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent a shrinking segment: genuinely affordable smartphones. Both launched around the same time, targeting price-conscious consumers, but diverge in their core hardware choices. This comparison dissects those differences, focusing on how the Mediatek Helio P65 in the vivo Y19 stacks up against the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 powering the Moto G8 Plus.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus offers a slightly more balanced experience. Its Snapdragon 665, while built on an 11nm process versus the Y19’s 12nm, delivers consistent performance and benefits from Qualcomm’s optimized software support. The comparable battery endurance and brighter display further solidify its position as the better all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, November 01. Released 2019, November | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.2 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.39 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6768 Helio P65 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.2 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 16 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired
5W reverse wired | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Magnetic Black, Spring White | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | 1915 | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) 0.31 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y19 (2019)
- 18W fast charging
- 5W reverse wired charging
- Potentially higher peak CPU performance (on paper)
- 12nm process node may lead to throttling
- Display brightness likely lower than Moto G8 Plus
- Less optimized software support
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- Brighter display (581 nits)
- More efficient Snapdragon 665 chipset
- Better thermal management
- Qualcomm software optimizations
- No reverse wired charging
- Slower charging speed (15W)
- Potentially less peak CPU performance
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 581 nits compared to the unspecified brightness of the vivo Y19. Both share a 1505:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar color depth and black levels. This higher peak brightness on the Moto G8 Plus translates to better visibility under direct sunlight, a crucial advantage for outdoor users. While neither display is expected to feature high refresh rates, the G8 Plus’s superior brightness is a clear win.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are described as having a 'Photo' camera, lacking specific details. However, given the market positioning, it’s safe to assume both rely on primary sensors around the 12-16MP range. Without further information on sensor size, aperture, or image processing algorithms, a definitive camera comparison is impossible. It’s likely both phones will struggle in low-light conditions, and the inclusion of 2MP macro lenses on both devices offers limited practical benefit. The image processing style will likely be the biggest differentiator, with Motorola generally favoring a more natural look.
Performance
The chipset battle pits Mediatek’s Helio P65 against Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 665. The Helio P65 utilizes a big.LITTLE architecture with two Cortex-A75 cores for performance and six Cortex-A55 cores for efficiency, while the Snapdragon 665 employs four Kryo 260 Gold and four Kryo 260 Silver cores. Despite the P65’s higher clock speeds (2.0 GHz vs 2.0 GHz), the Snapdragon 665’s 11nm process node offers better power efficiency and thermal management. This means the Moto G8 Plus is less likely to throttle under sustained load, providing more consistent performance during gaming or video editing. The Snapdragon 665 also benefits from Qualcomm’s established software optimizations.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y19 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus achieve an impressive endurance rating of 87 hours, indicating similar real-world battery life. However, the charging speeds differ: the Y19 supports 18W wired charging and 5W reverse wired charging, while the G8 Plus is limited to 15W wired charging. The Y19’s reverse charging capability is a unique advantage, allowing it to top up accessories like wireless earbuds or smartwatches. Despite the slightly slower charging speed, the G8 Plus’s efficient Snapdragon 665 contributes to its excellent battery endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y19 (2019) if you prioritize reverse wired charging for topping up accessories and are comfortable with potentially less consistent performance in demanding applications. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you value a brighter, more visible display in outdoor conditions, and a more refined software experience backed by Qualcomm’s chipset optimization, even if it means sacrificing reverse charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio P65 in the vivo Y19 struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P65 can run PUBG Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a smooth frame rate. The Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus offers more consistent performance in gaming due to its more efficient architecture and Qualcomm’s optimizations, allowing for potentially higher settings without significant frame drops.
❓ How useful is the 5W reverse charging on the vivo Y19 in real-world scenarios?
The 5W reverse charging is primarily useful for topping up small accessories like wireless earbuds, smartwatches, or Bluetooth speakers. It's not fast enough to significantly charge a smartphone, but it can provide a convenient boost for smaller devices when you're away from a power outlet.
❓ Does the Motorola Moto G8 Plus support any form of fast charging beyond 15W?
No, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus is limited to 15W wired charging. While not the fastest charging speed available, it's sufficient to charge the battery from 0-100% in approximately 2.5-3 hours. The Snapdragon 665’s efficiency also means you won’t be constantly needing to top it up.
