The vivo Y15a and Oppo A16e represent the fiercely competitive entry-level smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point. However, beneath the similar exterior lies a key difference: the chipset. This comparison dissects the nuances between the Mediatek Helio P35 in the Y15a and the Helio P22 in the A16e, revealing which device offers the better experience for everyday tasks.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness in daily apps and occasional multitasking, the vivo Y15a emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Helio P35 chipset, with its higher clock speeds, provides a noticeable performance edge over the Oppo A16e’s Helio P22, despite both sharing the same 12nm process.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 15 | 2022, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 15 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.46 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 175 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6762D Helio P22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 11, Funtouch 11.1 | Android 11, ColorOS 11.1 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, 27mm (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 5 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
5W reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Wave Green, Mystic Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | V2134 | CPH2421 |
| Price | About 140 EUR | About 120 EUR |
vivo Y15a
- Faster processor (Helio P35) for smoother multitasking.
- 5W reverse wired charging for emergency device top-ups.
- Potentially better app responsiveness.
- May be slightly more expensive than the Oppo A16e.
- Likely similar camera performance to the A16e.
Oppo A16e
- Potentially lower price point.
- Adequate performance for basic tasks.
- Simple and straightforward user experience.
- Slower processor (Helio P22) leading to noticeable lag.
- No reverse wired charging capability.
- Less responsive for demanding applications.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. Detailed specs like resolution and brightness are missing, but the focus here is on performance, not visual fidelity. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a budget. Color accuracy is likely standard for the segment, prioritizing power efficiency over color calibration.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely similar, relying heavily on software processing. Both devices likely feature a primary camera and potentially a depth sensor. The absence of detailed sensor information suggests both utilize budget sensors. The 2MP macro cameras often found in this segment are unlikely to deliver significant detail. Image quality will be acceptable in good lighting conditions, but will suffer in low-light scenarios. The image processing style will likely differ between the brands, potentially favoring different color profiles or sharpening levels.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y15a’s Mediatek Helio P35 features an octa-core configuration split into 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This contrasts with the Oppo A16e’s Helio P22, which utilizes a uniform octa-core setup clocked at 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53. While both are 12nm chips, the P35’s higher peak clock speeds suggest faster single-core and multi-core performance. This translates to quicker app launch times and smoother multitasking. The A16e’s P22, while still capable, will exhibit more noticeable lag when handling multiple applications simultaneously. Both devices likely feature limited RAM (spec not provided), further emphasizing the importance of the CPU’s processing power.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y15a and Oppo A16e support 10W wired charging, a standard for this price range. Actual battery capacity is not provided, but both will likely offer all-day battery life with moderate usage. The 0-100% charging time will be relatively slow, likely exceeding 2.5 hours. The Y15a also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a niche feature allowing it to charge other devices, albeit slowly. This is absent on the A16e.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y15a if you frequently switch between apps, use social media extensively, or occasionally play less demanding mobile games. The Helio P35’s CPU offers a smoother experience for these tasks. Buy the Oppo A16e if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and you prioritize a potentially lower price point. The A16e will handle these tasks adequately, but will show its limitations with heavier workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the vivo Y15a handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
While the Helio P35 is capable of running these games, expect to play them at the lowest graphics settings and potentially experience frame drops. These games are demanding and will push the chipset to its limits. The Oppo A16e will struggle even more with these titles.
❓ Is the difference in performance between the Helio P35 and P22 noticeable in everyday use, like browsing the web or using social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Y15a’s P35 will offer quicker app launch times, smoother scrolling, and less lag when switching between apps. The A16e’s P22 will handle these tasks, but with a slight delay that can become frustrating over time.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
Neither phone supports fast charging. Both are limited to 10W charging, meaning a full charge from 0% to 100% will likely take over 2.5 hours. The Y15a’s 5W reverse charging is significantly slower and intended for emergency top-ups only.
