The sub-€100 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The vivo Y15 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Y15 focuses on affordability, while the G8 Plus aims for a balance of features and performance. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Moto G8 Plus is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 665 chipset, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the vivo Y15’s Helio P22. While both boast similar battery endurance, the G8 Plus’s brighter display and more efficient processor make it the better all-rounder.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat13 600/100 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 28, 66 - LATAM |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, May 28. Released 2019, May | 2019, October 24. Released 2019, October 28 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 158.4 x 75.8 x 9.1 mm (6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190.5 g (6.74 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| | - | Water-repellent coating |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1544 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.35 inches, 99.6 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 | Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6762 Helio P22 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM665 Snapdragon 665 (11 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 10 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
16 MP, f/2.2, 14mm (ultrawide), dedicated video camera (1080p)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm | 25 MP, f/2.0, 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (market dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 15W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 4000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Aqua Blue, Burgundy Red | Dark Blue, Dark Red |
| Models | - | XT2019, XT2019-2 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 1.01 W/kg (head) 0.75 W/kg (body) | 0.59 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.59 W/kg (head) 0.88 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 64GB 4GB RAM | € 72.66 | - |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.2dB / Crosstalk -94.2dB |
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 87h |
| Camera | - |
Photo |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1505:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
Voice 79dB / Noise 74dB / Ring 80dB |
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 168699 (v8)
GeekBench: 5641 (v4.4), 1385 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.5fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y15
- Extremely affordable price point
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Lightweight and portable
- Underpowered Helio P22 chipset
- Likely inferior display quality
- Limited camera capabilities
Motorola Moto G8 Plus
- More powerful Snapdragon 665 processor
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- Faster 15W charging
- Slightly higher price
- May not be significantly better in camera performance without further specs
- Larger size and weight
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G8 Plus boasts a significantly more impressive display. Its measured peak brightness of 581 nits, coupled with a 1505:1 contrast ratio, ensures excellent visibility even in bright outdoor conditions. While the Y15’s display specifications are unavailable, it’s reasonable to assume it falls short of the G8 Plus in both brightness and contrast, typical for its price bracket. The G8 Plus’s larger screen size also contributes to a more immersive viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo' cameras, which is unhelpful. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, given the G8 Plus’s positioning, it likely features a more capable primary sensor and potentially better image processing algorithms. The Y15, aiming for the lowest possible price, likely compromises on camera quality. The presence of a larger sensor and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS) on the G8 Plus would be significant advantages, though unconfirmed.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Moto G8 Plus utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (11nm), featuring a Kryo CPU architecture with a mix of performance (2.0 GHz) and efficiency (1.8 GHz) cores. This contrasts with the vivo Y15’s MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm), which relies solely on Cortex-A53 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. The 11nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 665 offers better power efficiency and thermal management, translating to sustained performance during demanding tasks. The G8 Plus’s CPU architecture is also more modern, providing a performance edge in multi-threaded applications.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y15 and Motorola Moto G8 Plus achieve an impressive endurance rating of 87 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage patterns. However, the Snapdragon 665’s superior power efficiency in the G8 Plus means it can potentially deliver that endurance with a slightly smaller battery capacity. The G8 Plus also supports 15W wired charging, offering faster replenishment compared to the Y15, whose charging speed is unknown but likely slower.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y15 if your primary need is an extremely affordable smartphone for basic tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use. Its lower price point makes it ideal for first-time smartphone owners or as a reliable backup device. Buy the Motorola Moto G8 Plus if you prioritize smoother multitasking, occasional gaming, and a more enjoyable media consumption experience. The Snapdragon 665 offers a tangible performance boost, justifying the slightly higher cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Motorola Moto G8 Plus handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a smooth experience. The Helio P22 in the Y15 will struggle with consistent frame rates, even on the lowest settings.
❓ Is the battery life of the Moto G8 Plus significantly better in real-world use?
While both have an 87-hour endurance rating, the Snapdragon 665’s efficiency means the Moto G8 Plus will likely maintain that endurance even with more intensive app usage. The Y15’s battery may deplete faster with prolonged gaming or video streaming.
❓ How does the Helio P22 perform with multitasking?
The Helio P22 is adequate for basic multitasking, such as switching between messaging apps and web browsing. However, it will exhibit noticeable slowdowns when running multiple demanding applications simultaneously. The Snapdragon 665 in the Moto G8 Plus handles multitasking much more smoothly.
❓ What kind of storage and RAM options are available for the vivo Y15?
The vivo Y15 is available in a 64GB storage configuration with 4GB of RAM. This is sufficient for basic usage, but users may need to rely on a microSD card for storing photos, videos, and larger apps.
