The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y11s and the Tecno Spark 6 Go aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly accessible price point. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Y11s leveraging Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 460, while the Spark 6 Go offers variations with either the MediaTek Helio A20 or A25. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y11s emerges as the better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Tecno Spark 6 Go’s Helio A20/A25, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While both phones are entry-level, the Y11s offers a more future-proof platform.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 21. Released 2021, January 05 | 2020, November 22. Released 2020, November 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 165.6 x 76.3 x 9.1 mm (6.52 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53)Quad-core 1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6761D Helio A20 (12 nm) - 2GB, 3GB modelMediatek MT6762D Helio A25 (12 nm) - 4GB model |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 10 (Go edition), HIOS 6.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, Panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | - |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Phantom Black | Ice Jadelite, Mystery White, Aqua Blue |
| Models | V2028 | KE5j, KE5k |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 70 EUR |
vivo Y11s
- More powerful Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Better power efficiency for longer battery life
- Smoother multitasking experience
- 10W charging is slow
- Camera performance is likely basic
Tecno Spark 6 Go
- Lower price point
- Potentially larger battery capacity (depending on model)
- Android Go edition may offer a cleaner experience (depending on software)
- Significantly weaker Helio A20/A25 chipset
- Less responsive user interface
- Limited performance for demanding apps
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common trait in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on visual fidelity, but on basic functionality. While specific display specs (resolution, brightness) are unavailable, the emphasis is on providing a readable screen for essential tasks. Bezels are expected to be relatively thick on both models, maximizing screen real estate within a budget-friendly design.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited. Both are likely to feature a primary camera alongside auxiliary sensors of questionable utility. Given the context, it's safe to assume the primary camera on both phones will be a basic sensor, prioritizing affordability over image quality. The Tecno Spark 6 Go may include additional sensors (depth, macro) but these are unlikely to deliver significant improvements in image quality. The Snapdragon 460’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Y11s may offer slightly better image processing capabilities, but the overall camera experience will be similar on both devices – adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The vivo Y11s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 (11nm) is a significant step up from the Tecno Spark 6 Go’s MediaTek Helio A20 (12nm) or Helio A25 (12nm). The 11nm process node of the Snapdragon 460 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal performance. The Snapdragon 460’s octa-core configuration (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) offers a more balanced approach to performance compared to the Helio A20’s (4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.5 GHz Cortex-A53) or the A25’s quad-core setup. This means the Y11s will handle multitasking and app switching more smoothly, and is more likely to remain responsive over time. The Helio A25 variant of the Spark 6 Go offers a slight improvement over the A20, but still falls short of the Snapdragon 460.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this segment. However, the Snapdragon 460’s superior power efficiency in the Y11s could translate to slightly longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity battery to the Spark 6 Go. Both devices are limited to 10W charging, meaning charging times will be relatively slow – expect several hours to fully charge from 0 to 100%.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y11s if you prioritize consistent performance for everyday tasks like social media, messaging, and light web browsing. Its Snapdragon 460 chipset will handle these workloads more efficiently. Buy the Tecno Spark 6 Go if your primary concern is absolute affordability and you only need a phone for very basic communication – calls, texts, and minimal app usage. The Spark 6 Go’s lower price point makes it a viable option for first-time smartphone users or those on extremely tight budgets.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Spark 6 Go struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Spark 6 Go can run these apps, the Helio A20/A25 chipset may result in noticeable lag and slowdowns, especially when multitasking or using the apps for extended periods. The vivo Y11s, with its Snapdragon 460, will provide a much smoother experience.
❓ Is the 10W charging on either phone sufficient for daily use?
10W charging is quite slow by modern standards. Expect to spend several hours fully charging either device. It's best to charge overnight to ensure you have sufficient battery life for the next day.
❓ Does the Tecno Spark 6 Go benefit from the Android Go edition software?
Some variants of the Tecno Spark 6 Go ship with Android Go edition, a streamlined version of Android designed for low-end hardware. This can improve performance and reduce storage usage, but it also means some features found in the full Android experience may be missing.
❓ Can the vivo Y11s handle light gaming?
The Snapdragon 460 can handle some light gaming, but don't expect to play demanding titles at high settings. Games like Subway Surfers or Candy Crush will run fine, but more graphically intensive games may experience lag or require significant compromises in graphics settings.
