The vivo Y11s and Oppo A15s represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price point, but they take different approaches under the hood. This comparison dissects the key differences – specifically the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 versus the MediaTek Helio P35 – to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y11s emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, built on a more efficient 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Oppo A15s’ Helio P35, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. While both offer identical 10W charging, the Snapdragon’s efficiency contributes to potentially better battery life.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 21. Released 2021, January 05 | 2020, December 18. Released 2020, December 18 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, Panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Phantom Black | Dynamic Black, Fancy White |
| Models | V2028 | CPH2179 |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 130 EUR |
vivo Y11s
- More efficient Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Potentially better battery life due to 11nm process
- Smoother multitasking experience
- 10W charging is slow
- Limited camera details available
Oppo A15s
- Potentially lower price point
- Adequate for basic smartphone tasks
- 10W charging is standard for the segment
- Less efficient Helio P35 chipset
- May struggle with demanding apps
- Potential for more noticeable throttling
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Oppo provide detailed display specifications beyond the basic resolution. However, the display is likely a standard LCD panel on both devices, typical for this price bracket. The real difference lies in the processing power driving the display, which we'll cover in the performance section. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles on both, with neither offering features like high refresh rates or HDR support.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar camera setups, focusing on basic image capture. Given the price point, detailed camera specs are scarce. It’s safe to assume both will include a primary camera and potentially depth or macro sensors, but image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device means low-light performance will be limited. The primary sensor’s aperture will be a key factor, but without specific details, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. Expect similar results in good lighting conditions, with both struggling in challenging environments.
Performance
The core differentiator between these two phones is their chipsets. The vivo Y11s utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, fabricated on an 11nm process. This translates to improved power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the Oppo A15s’ MediaTek Helio P35, which is built on a larger 12nm node. The Snapdragon 460’s octa-core CPU (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) offers a more balanced performance profile than the Helio P35’s (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53). While the Helio P35 boasts higher clock speeds on its prime cores, the Snapdragon 460’s architecture and process node provide a more consistent and efficient experience, particularly during sustained workloads. This means less throttling and a smoother experience when switching between apps.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y11s and Oppo A15s are equipped with 10W wired charging, indicating a similar charging experience – expect around 2-3 hours for a full charge. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 460’s superior power efficiency in the vivo Y11s could translate to slightly longer battery life during typical usage. The 11nm process allows the Snapdragon to consume less power for the same tasks, potentially giving the Y11s an edge in endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y11s if you prioritize a smoother, more responsive user experience, especially when multitasking or running slightly demanding apps. It’s the better option for users who want a phone that feels less sluggish over time. Buy the Oppo A15s if you are looking for the absolute lowest price and your usage is limited to basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media browsing. The Helio P35 is adequate for these scenarios, but will struggle with more intensive workloads.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A15s struggle with popular apps like Facebook or WhatsApp?
While the Oppo A15s can run apps like Facebook and WhatsApp, the Helio P35 chipset may exhibit noticeable lag or slowdowns when multiple apps are open simultaneously. The Snapdragon 460 in the vivo Y11s will handle these apps more smoothly, especially with frequent multitasking.
❓ Is the 10W charging speed acceptable for daily use on either phone?
10W charging is relatively slow by today’s standards. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours on both the vivo Y11s and Oppo A15s. It’s best to charge these phones overnight to ensure they’re ready for the next day.
❓ Can either of these phones handle basic mobile gaming?
Both phones can handle very basic mobile games, but don't expect a high-performance gaming experience. The Snapdragon 460 in the vivo Y11s will provide a slightly smoother experience for less demanding titles, while the Helio P35 in the Oppo A15s may struggle with more graphically intensive games.
