The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y11s and the Infinix Smart 5 Pro aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price. However, they take drastically different approaches to achieving this, relying on contrasting chipsets and architectures. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the vivo Y11s emerges as the better choice. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset, built on an 11nm process, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Infinix Smart 5 Pro’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). While both offer similar 10W charging, the Y11s’ more efficient processor translates to better overall responsiveness and a smoother user experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 21.1/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, October 21. Released 2021, January 05 | 2021, November 17 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021, November 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.4 x 76.3 x 8.4 mm (6.47 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) | 164.4 x 75.6 x 9.5 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 191 g (6.74 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SM4250 Snapdragon 460 (11 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 10, Funtouch 11 | Android 11 (Go edition), XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 3GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 13 MP, f/1.8, AF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash, Panorama | Quad-LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8, (wide) | 8 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 4.2, A2DP |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glacier Blue, Phantom Black | Morandi Green, Heart of Ocean |
| Models | V2028 | - |
| Price | About 270 EUR | About 70 EUR |
vivo Y11s
- More powerful Snapdragon 460 chipset
- Better power efficiency for longer battery life
- Superior image processing capabilities
- May be slightly more expensive than the Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Likely lacks advanced features found in higher-end phones
Infinix Smart 5 Pro
- Lower upfront cost
- Acceptable for basic communication tasks
- Potentially larger battery capacity (unconfirmed)
- Less powerful Unisoc SC9863A chipset
- Higher power consumption and potential for overheating
- Slower app loading times and less responsive UI
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, a common cost-saving measure in this segment. However, specifics like resolution and peak brightness are not provided. The key difference lies under the hood: the processor powering the display. The Snapdragon 460’s integrated GPU will likely deliver a slightly smoother scrolling experience, even if the panel characteristics are identical. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, reflecting their budget positioning.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Y11s benefits from the Snapdragon 460’s image signal processor (ISP), which offers superior image processing capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC9863A’s ISP. This means better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, even with similar sensor hardware. The prevalence of 2MP macro/depth sensors on both devices suggests limited utility; these are primarily for marketing purposes.
Performance
This is where the Y11s truly shines. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, fabricated on an 11nm process, is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Unisoc SC9863A’s 28nm architecture. The Snapdragon’s octa-core configuration (4x1.8 GHz Kryo 240 & 4x1.6 GHz Kryo 240) offers a more balanced approach to performance, while the Smart 5 Pro’s (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) split configuration suggests a greater emphasis on power saving at the expense of responsiveness. The larger process node of the Unisoc chip will result in higher power consumption and potentially more heat generation during sustained use. This translates to a more noticeable performance difference in multitasking and app loading times.
Battery Life
Both devices are equipped with 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds (expect around 2-3 hours for a full charge). While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 460’s superior power efficiency will allow the Y11s to achieve longer battery life on a single charge. The 28nm Unisoc chip in the Smart 5 Pro will consume more power, leading to more frequent charging needs, despite potentially having a similar or slightly larger battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y11s if you prioritize consistent performance for everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. The Snapdragon 460 offers a more fluid experience and better long-term software support potential. Buy the Infinix Smart 5 Pro if your primary need is a very low upfront cost and you primarily use your phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and minimal app usage. Be prepared for potential slowdowns with heavier tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Smart 5 Pro struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
The Unisoc SC9863A chipset, while functional, is likely to exhibit slowdowns and lag when running multiple apps simultaneously, including popular social media platforms like WhatsApp and Facebook. Users should expect longer loading times and a less fluid experience compared to the vivo Y11s.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 460 in the vivo Y11s capable of playing any mobile games?
The Snapdragon 460 can handle less demanding mobile games like *Candy Crush* or *Angry Birds* without significant issues. However, graphically intensive titles like *PUBG Mobile* or *Call of Duty: Mobile* will likely require very low graphics settings and may still experience frame drops and lag. It's best suited for casual gaming.
❓ How much faster is the Snapdragon 460 compared to the Unisoc SC9863A in real-world usage?
The Snapdragon 460 is approximately 30-40% faster in CPU performance and offers a significantly more capable GPU. This translates to quicker app launches, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the vivo Y11s. The difference will be most noticeable when switching between apps or performing demanding tasks.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging beyond the 10W standard?
Neither the vivo Y11s nor the Infinix Smart 5 Pro supports fast charging technologies. Both are limited to 10W wired charging, meaning a full charge will take approximately 2-3 hours. This is typical for phones in this price range.
