The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. Both the vivo Y11 (2023) and the Infinix Smart 7 HD aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an incredibly accessible price point. However, they take different approaches to achieving this, with the Y11 leaning on a more established chipset while the Smart 7 HD focuses on simplicity. This comparison will dissect their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness and a slightly smoother experience, the vivo Y11 (2023) is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio P35 chipset, while not a powerhouse, offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Infinix Smart 7 HD’s unspecified CPU, making everyday tasks feel less sluggish. However, the Smart 7 HD remains a viable option for those with extremely basic needs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | CDMA2000 1x | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 01 | 2023, April 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 01 | Available. Released 2023, April 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164 x 75.6 x 8.5 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.33 in) | 163.9 x 75.5 x 8.7 mm (6.45 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 196.5 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.51 inches, 102.3 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 500 nits |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core 1.6 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) | - |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | - |
| OS | Android 12, OriginOS Ocean | Android 12 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 2GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP, f/2.0
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0 | 8 MP, f/2.0
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.2 | 5 MP, f/2.0 |
| Video | Yes | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired
5W reverse wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Grey, Orchid Blue | Ink Black, Silk Blue, Jade White, Green Apple |
| Models | V2236A | X6516 |
| Price | About 120 EUR | About 110 EUR |
vivo Y11 (2023)
- More powerful Helio P35 chipset for smoother performance
- 5W reverse wired charging for emergency power sharing
- Potentially better power efficiency due to 12nm process
- Limited detailed specifications available
- 10W charging is relatively slow
Infinix Smart 7 HD
- Likely lower initial cost
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Potentially longer standby time due to less demanding chipset
- Significantly weaker CPU performance
- No reverse charging capability
- Limited upgrade path
Display Comparison
Neither vivo nor Infinix provide detailed display specifications beyond the basic resolution. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The absence of information regarding peak brightness or color gamut suggests neither device will excel in outdoor visibility or color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within a budget-friendly form factor. The focus here is clearly on cost reduction, not display quality.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar on both devices, leaning towards basic functionality. Neither manufacturer highlights advanced camera features. Given the price bracket, expect 8MP or 5MP main sensors with limited dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details regarding aperture sizes suggests both will struggle in challenging lighting conditions. Any additional cameras (likely 2MP depth or macro sensors) on either device are unlikely to provide significant value. Image processing will be basic, prioritizing speed over quality.
Performance
The vivo Y11 (2023) boasts a Mediatek Helio P35 (12nm) chipset with an octa-core CPU configuration (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53). This is a significant advantage over the Infinix Smart 7 HD, which only lists an octa-core CPU clocked at 1.6 GHz without specifying the architecture. The Helio P35’s Cortex-A53 cores, while older, are more efficient and capable than the likely Cortex-A53 cores in the Smart 7 HD, resulting in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The 12nm process node of the Helio P35 also contributes to better power efficiency. The lack of RAM specifications for both devices makes it difficult to assess multitasking capabilities fully, but the chipset difference is the key differentiator.
Battery Life
Both the vivo Y11 (2023) and the Infinix Smart 7 HD feature 10W wired charging. While the charging wattage is identical, the Helio P35’s greater power efficiency in the Y11 could translate to slightly longer battery life despite potentially similar battery capacities (which are not specified). A full 0-100% charge on both devices will likely take around 2.5 to 3 hours. The Y11 also offers 5W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Smart 7 HD, allowing it to act as a power bank for other devices, albeit slowly.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y11 (2023) if you need a phone capable of handling more than just basic calling and texting – light social media browsing, occasional photo taking, and running a few apps simultaneously will be less frustrating. Buy the Infinix Smart 7 HD if your primary use case is voice calls, SMS messaging, and minimal app usage, and you prioritize simplicity and potentially a lower initial cost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the vivo Y11 (2023) be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and Instagram smoothly?
Yes, the Mediatek Helio P35 chipset in the vivo Y11 (2023) is capable of running most popular social media apps without significant lag. While it won't offer a high-end experience, it should provide a usable and reasonably smooth experience for browsing feeds and posting updates.
❓ Is the Infinix Smart 7 HD suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for making calls and sending texts?
Absolutely. The Infinix Smart 7 HD is an excellent choice for users with basic needs. Its simpler processor and focus on essential functions make it reliable for voice calls and SMS messaging. The lower processing demands also contribute to potentially longer battery life in standby mode.
❓ Can I play games on either of these phones?
While both phones *can* technically run games, the experience will be limited. Simple, less demanding 2D games will be playable on both. However, graphically intensive 3D games will likely suffer from low frame rates and lag, especially on the Infinix Smart 7 HD. The vivo Y11 (2023) will offer a slightly better gaming experience due to its more powerful chipset, but it's still not designed for serious gaming.
