Both the Nokia 7.2 and the vivo Y11 (2019) represent budget-friendly options in the Android ecosystem, but cater to different user needs. The Nokia 7.2, released with a focus on photography and a more refined experience, faces off against the vivo Y11, a more basic device aimed at essential smartphone functionality. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right phone.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Nokia 7.2 is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 660 chipset delivers significantly better performance than the Snapdragon 439 in the vivo Y11, and its brighter, higher-contrast display enhances the overall user experience. While both offer 10W charging, the Nokia 7.2 provides more for a similar price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 - ROW |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - ROW |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (2CA) Cat6 300/50 Mbps or LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 - IN |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2019, October 18. Released 2019, October | 2019, September 05. Released 2019, September 23 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 159.4 x 76.8 x 8.9 mm (6.28 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.2 x 8.3 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 190.5 g (6.74 oz) | 180 g (6.35 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1544 pixels, 19.3:9 ratio (~268 ppi density) | 1080 x 2280 pixels, 19:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.35 inches, 99.6 cm2 (~81.4% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.3 inches, 99.1 cm2 (~82.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, HDR10 |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.45 GHz Cortex A53) | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) |
| Chipset | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 (14 nm) |
| GPU | Adreno 505 | Adreno 512 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), Funtouch 9.1 | Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, Android One |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM, 32GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, f/2.2, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Zeiss optics, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | - | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps (gyro-EIS) |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Zeiss optics, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/1.8 | 20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | Yes (excl. India) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 3500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Agate Red, Mineral Blue | Cyan Green, Charcoal, Ice |
| Models | 1906, 1906_20 | TA-1193, TA-1178, TA-1196, TA-1181 |
| Price | About 70 EUR | About 240 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.15 W/kg (head) 0.90 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.44 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Audio quality | - |
Noise -93.0dB / Crosstalk -93.4dB |
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 69h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1342:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.6 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 139495 (v7), 164484 (v8)
GeekBench: 5440 (v4.4), 1398 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
vivo Y11 (2019)
- Extremely affordable price point
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Decent battery life for basic usage
- Slow processor struggles with multitasking
- Low display brightness and contrast
- Limited camera capabilities
Nokia 7.2
- Significantly faster Snapdragon 660 processor
- Brighter and higher-contrast display
- More capable camera system
- Good battery endurance
- 10W charging is relatively slow
- May be slightly more expensive than the vivo Y11
- Build quality may not be premium
Display Comparison
The Nokia 7.2 boasts a significantly more impressive display. With a measured peak brightness of 585 nits, it easily surpasses what we'd expect from the vivo Y11, which lacks published brightness data but is likely lower given its market positioning. The 1342:1 contrast ratio, while nominal, indicates a better visual experience with deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels, the Nokia 7.2’s higher brightness makes it far more usable outdoors under direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but the Nokia 7.2 likely offers a more refined camera experience. While specific sensor details are missing, the Snapdragon 660’s image signal processor (ISP) is more advanced than the SD439’s, resulting in better image processing, dynamic range, and low-light performance. The vivo Y11’s camera is likely geared towards basic snapshots, while the Nokia 7.2 aims for more detailed and aesthetically pleasing results. It's important to note that the presence of a 2MP macro lens on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality.
Performance
The core difference between these two devices lies in their chipsets. The Nokia 7.2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (14nm) is a substantial upgrade over the vivo Y11’s Snapdragon 439 (12nm). The SD660 features Kryo 260 cores clocked up to 2.2 GHz, compared to the SD439’s Cortex-A53 cores peaking at 1.95 GHz. This translates to a noticeable improvement in app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface. The SD660’s architecture also handles graphics more efficiently, making it a better choice for casual gaming. The 14nm process node of the SD660, while older, doesn't necessarily equate to worse efficiency; the architectural improvements offset the node size difference.
Battery Life
Both the Nokia 7.2 and vivo Y11 (2019) are equipped with 10W wired charging, indicating similar charging speeds. The Nokia 7.2’s endurance rating of 69 hours suggests efficient power management, likely due to the optimized Snapdragon 660 chipset. While the vivo Y11’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its less powerful processor may contribute to comparable battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery. However, the slower charging speed means both phones will take a considerable amount of time to fully recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y11 (2019) if you prioritize extreme affordability and only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media use. Buy the Nokia 7.2 if you value smoother performance for multitasking, a more enjoyable viewing experience with its brighter display, and a more capable camera system for capturing everyday moments.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 660 in the Nokia 7.2 still capable of running modern apps smoothly?
Yes, the Snapdragon 660 remains a capable processor for everyday tasks and even some moderate gaming. While it's not a flagship-level chip, its eight cores and optimized architecture provide a smooth experience for most apps and multitasking scenarios, significantly outperforming the Snapdragon 439.
❓ Does the Nokia 7.2 support fast charging, and how long does it take to fully charge?
Unfortunately, both the Nokia 7.2 and the vivo Y11 (2019) are limited to 10W wired charging. This means a full charge will take approximately 2-3 hours, depending on the battery level. While not ideal, the Nokia 7.2’s efficient power management helps mitigate the impact of the slow charging speed.
❓ How does the camera on the Nokia 7.2 perform in low-light conditions compared to the vivo Y11?
The Nokia 7.2 is expected to perform significantly better in low-light conditions. The Snapdragon 660’s advanced ISP and likely larger sensor size allow it to capture more light and reduce noise, resulting in clearer and more detailed images compared to the vivo Y11’s camera.
