The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the vivo Y100t and Xiaomi Redmi K70E represent compelling options powered by Mediatek's Dimensity series. While both aim for a balance of performance and affordability, they diverge in key areas like chipset choice and charging speed, making a direct comparison crucial for discerning buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Redmi K70E emerges as the stronger contender. Its Dimensity 8300 Ultra offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Y100t’s Dimensity 8200, justifying the slight price difference. However, the Y100t’s 120W charging remains a significant advantage for those valuing speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 23 | 2023, November 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 28 | Available. Released 2023, November 29 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | OLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, (wide), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS
8 MP, 120˚, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired
Reverse wired | 90W wired, PD3.0, QC2, 100% in 34 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, White, Mint |
| Models | V2314A | 2311DRK48C |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 260 EUR |
vivo Y100t
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Potentially more efficient power consumption due to slightly less powerful chipset
- Competitive price point
- Dimensity 8200 is a generation behind the 8300 Ultra
- May exhibit more throttling under sustained load
Xiaomi Redmi K70E
- More powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset
- Superior CPU and GPU performance
- Potentially better camera system with OIS
- Slower 90W charging compared to the Y100t
- May run hotter under heavy load
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the market positioning, both likely feature AMOLED panels with high refresh rates. The Redmi K70E, being a slightly more premium offering, may benefit from a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rate control, leading to improved battery efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable, and color accuracy will depend on software calibration.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup with a primary sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. The Redmi K70E, positioned as a slightly higher-tier device, may feature a larger primary sensor with optical image stabilization (OIS), resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. Image processing algorithms will also play a role, with Xiaomi typically favoring more vibrant and saturated colors, while vivo often aims for a more natural look.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi K70E’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4nm) boasts a more modern CPU architecture with its Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 3.35 GHz, compared to the vivo Y100t’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm) and its Cortex-A78 cores at 3.1 GHz. This architectural shift, combined with the higher clock speeds, translates to a roughly 15-20% performance advantage for the K70E in CPU-intensive tasks. The K70E also benefits from newer GPU architecture. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, but the K70E’s superior SoC will better leverage its bandwidth. Thermal management will be critical; the K70E’s higher performance ceiling may necessitate a more robust cooling solution to prevent throttling.
Battery Life
The Redmi K70E’s 90W wired charging, while respectable, is outpaced by the vivo Y100t’s 120W wired charging. The Y100t can fully charge in a significantly shorter time, potentially under 30 minutes. While the K70E claims 100% in 34 minutes, the Y100t will be faster. Battery capacity is not specified, but the faster charging of the Y100t can mitigate the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The K70E also supports PD3.0 and QC2, offering wider compatibility with chargers.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100t if you prioritize incredibly fast charging and a slightly more conservative, potentially more efficient power profile. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and value minimizing heat during extended use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi K70E if you demand the highest possible performance within this price bracket, particularly for gaming and demanding applications. It’s the better choice for power users and those planning to keep their phone for several years.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Redmi K70E’s Dimensity 8300 Ultra get noticeably hotter than the vivo Y100t during prolonged gaming sessions?
Yes, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s higher performance ceiling will generate more heat. While Xiaomi likely incorporates thermal management solutions, the Y100t’s Dimensity 8200 will generally run cooler, potentially offering a more consistent gaming experience without significant throttling, though at a performance cost.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the vivo Y100t compared to the 90W charging on the Redmi K70E in real-world use?
The Y100t’s 120W charging will shave off approximately 10-15 minutes from a full 0-100% charge compared to the K70E’s 90W charging. This difference is most noticeable when rapidly topping up the battery from a low percentage.
❓ Does the Redmi K70E support features like 144Hz refresh rate for smoother gaming?
While not explicitly stated, given the Redmi K70E’s positioning and the Dimensity 8300 Ultra’s capabilities, it is highly probable that the device supports a high refresh rate display, likely 120Hz or 144Hz, for a smoother visual experience in games and general use.
