The Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro and vivo Y100t represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Civi 4 Pro arrives with Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Y100t leverages the well-established Mediatek Dimensity 8200. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on performance, charging speeds, and overall value to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Dimensity 8200 in the Y100t, despite the Y100t’s faster 120W charging. However, the Y100t remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 23 | 2024, March 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, February 28 | Available. Released 2024, March 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus 2), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in) | 157.2 x 72.8 x 7.5 mm or 7.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 177.6 or 179.3 g or 180.9 g (6.28 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1236 x 2750 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.5 cm2 (~90.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 735 |
| OS | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | Android 14, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama, Leica lenses |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, 25mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
12 MP, f/2.2, 15mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, 720p@1920fps, HDR10+, BT.2020, 10-bit video, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF
32 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD | 5.4, A2DP, LE, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | No | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 120W wired
Reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 40 minutes |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Black, Blue, Silver | Black, Pink, Blue, Green |
| Models | V2314A | 24053PY09C |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 380 EUR |
vivo Y100t
- Significantly faster 120W charging
- Potentially more affordable price
- Capable Dimensity 8200 chipset for everyday tasks
- Older chipset architecture compared to Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
- Potentially less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro
- More powerful Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 chipset
- Superior sustained performance and thermal management
- Likely better camera image processing
- Slower 67W charging
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Civi series’ focus on aesthetics, it’s reasonable to expect a high-quality AMOLED panel with potentially higher peak brightness and color accuracy. The Y100t, being a more value-focused device, may utilize a slightly less premium panel. Both are likely to feature a 120Hz refresh rate, common in this segment. Bezels are likely to be similar, with the Civi 4 Pro potentially having slightly slimmer ones due to its design emphasis.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera sensor details, analysis is limited. However, Xiaomi’s Civi line often prioritizes selfie capabilities, suggesting a strong front-facing camera on the Civi 4 Pro. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. The Y100t will likely offer a competent camera system, but may not match the Civi 4 Pro’s image quality, particularly in challenging conditions. We can assume both will have multi-camera setups, but the Civi 4 Pro is likely to have a larger main sensor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro’s Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside four Cortex-A720 cores at 2.8 GHz and three Cortex-A520 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture is a step up from the vivo Y100t’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm), which features a Cortex-A78 prime core at 3.1 GHz, three Cortex-A78 cores at 3.0 GHz, and four Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. While the Y100t’s prime core has a higher clock speed, the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3’s newer architecture and more efficient core design translate to superior sustained performance and improved thermal management. The Civi 4 Pro will likely exhibit better performance in graphically intensive tasks and demanding games.
Battery Life
The vivo Y100t’s 120W wired charging is a standout feature, promising significantly faster charging times than the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro’s 67W charging. While the Civi 4 Pro supports PD3.0 and claims a 100% charge in 40 minutes, the Y100t will likely achieve a full charge in under 30 minutes. However, battery capacity isn’t specified for either device. The faster charging of the Y100t could offset a potentially smaller battery, making it more convenient for users who need quick top-ups. The Civi 4 Pro’s more efficient chipset may also contribute to better battery life despite the slower charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the vivo Y100t if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are looking for a capable all-rounder at a potentially lower price point. Its 120W charging is a significant advantage for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly. Buy the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro if you demand the best possible performance in this price bracket, particularly for gaming and demanding applications, and value the benefits of a newer chipset architecture.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Dimensity 8200 in the vivo Y100t struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 8200 is a capable chipset, it may require lower graphics settings and frame rate caps in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact to maintain stable performance and prevent overheating. The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Civi 4 Pro will handle these games more comfortably at higher settings.
❓ How much faster is the 120W charging on the vivo Y100t compared to the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro in real-world use?
The 120W charging on the Y100t can add a significant amount of charge in a short period. Expect a 0-50% charge in around 10-15 minutes, while the Civi 4 Pro will take closer to 20-25 minutes for the same level. A full charge will be completed in under 30 minutes for the Y100t, compared to 40 minutes for the Civi 4 Pro.
❓ Does the Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 in the Xiaomi Civi 4 Pro get noticeably hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to previous Snapdragon generations. While some heat is inevitable during extended gaming, the Civi 4 Pro should manage temperatures well enough to avoid significant throttling, providing a more consistent gaming experience than the Dimensity 8200 under similar load.
