Realme GT Neo6 SE vs vivo Y100t: A Deep Dive into Mid-Range Power

The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Realme GT Neo6 SE and vivo Y100t represent compelling options. The GT Neo6 SE brings Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 to the table, while the Y100t leverages the established Mediatek Dimensity 8200. This comparison will dissect their strengths and weaknesses to determine which device offers the best balance of performance, features, and value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Realme GT Neo6 SE emerges as the stronger contender. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 offers a noticeable performance uplift in both CPU and GPU tasks, translating to a smoother experience, particularly in gaming. While the vivo Y100t boasts faster 120W charging, the GT Neo6 SE’s overall package is more refined.

PHONES
Phone Names vivo Y100t Realme GT Neo6 SE
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100
4G bands1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41
5G bands1, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA
SpeedHSPA, LTE, 5GHSPA, LTE, 5G
TechnologyGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5GGSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G
Launch
Announced2024, February 232024, April 11
StatusAvailable. Released 2024, February 28Available. Released 2024, April 17
Body
BuildGlass front, plastic frame-
Dimensions164.6 x 75.8 x 8.8 mm (6.48 x 2.98 x 0.35 in)162 x 75.1 x 8.7 mm (6.38 x 2.96 x 0.34 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight200 g (7.05 oz)191 g (6.74 oz)
Display
Resolution1080 x 2388 pixels (~395 ppi density)1264 x 2780 pixels (~450 ppi density)
Size6.64 inches, 106.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio)6.78 inches, 111.7 cm2 (~91.8% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeIPS LCD, 120HzLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM), 6000 nits (peak)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x1.9 GHz Cortex-A520)
ChipsetMediatek Dimensity 8200 (4 nm)Qualcomm SM7675 Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4 nm)
GPUMali-G610 MC6Adreno 732
OSAndroid 13, OriginOS 3Android 14, Realme UI 5.0
Memory
Card slotNoNo
Internal256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM
Main Camera
Dual64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS Auxiliary lens50 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.95", PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panoramaColor spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama
Video4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps
Selfie camera
Features-Panorama
Single16 MP, f/2.5, (wide)32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide), 1/2.74"
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
Sound
35mm jackYesNo
Loudspeaker YesYes, with stereo speakers
Comms
Bluetooth5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, LHDC
Infrared port-Yes
NFCYesYes
PositioningGPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1)GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC, GLONASS
RadioNoNo
USBUSB Type-C 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band
Features
SensorsFingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging120W wired Reverse wired100W wired, 50% in 12 min
Type5000 mAh5500 mAh
Misc
ColorsBlack, Blue, SilverSilver, Green
ModelsV2314ARMX3850
PriceAbout 200 EURAbout 250 EUR

vivo Y100t

  • Faster 120W charging for quick top-ups
  • Potentially more affordable price point
  • Solid Mediatek Dimensity 8200 performance

  • Older chipset architecture compared to Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3
  • Likely less refined camera system
  • Potentially less efficient power management

Realme GT Neo6 SE

  • More powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 chipset
  • Superior GPU performance for gaming
  • Likely better display quality (brightness, LTPO)

  • Slower 100W charging compared to vivo Y100t
  • Potentially higher price
  • May require more careful thermal management

Display Comparison

Neither device’s display specifications are provided, so we must infer. Given the price bracket, both likely feature AMOLED panels with at least 120Hz refresh rates. However, the Realme GT Neo6 SE, aligning with Realme’s recent focus, is likely to offer a higher peak brightness and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rate control, improving battery efficiency. The Y100t, while likely good, may not match the GT Neo6 SE’s display refinement.

Camera Comparison

Without specific camera sensor details, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Realme typically prioritizes camera performance in its GT series. We can expect the GT Neo6 SE to feature a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially a larger main sensor with OIS. The Y100t, while capable, likely focuses on providing a functional camera experience rather than pushing boundaries. The absence of details suggests neither phone will feature a standout camera system, focusing instead on overall value.

Performance

The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Realme GT Neo6 SE’s Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (4nm) utilizes a 1x2.8 GHz Cortex-X4 prime core, offering superior single-core performance compared to the vivo Y100t’s Dimensity 8200 (4nm) and its 1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 core. While the Dimensity 8200 has a higher clock speed on its prime core, the Cortex-X4 architecture in the Snapdragon is more efficient and powerful. The Snapdragon also benefits from newer Adreno GPU architecture, providing a more substantial gaming advantage. Both utilize 4nm fabrication, but Qualcomm’s optimizations generally lead to better thermal management under sustained load.

Battery Life

The vivo Y100t’s 120W wired charging is its headline battery feature, promising incredibly fast top-ups. Realme’s 100W charging is still very fast, reaching 50% in 12 minutes, but lags behind. However, battery life isn’t solely determined by charging speed. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3’s efficiency could offset a potentially smaller battery capacity in the GT Neo6 SE, providing comparable or even better real-world endurance. The Y100t’s faster charging is ideal for users who need quick boosts, while the GT Neo6 SE may offer more consistent battery life.

Buying Guide

Buy the vivo Y100t if you prioritize the absolute fastest charging speeds and frequently top up your phone throughout the day. Its 120W charging is a significant advantage. Buy the Realme GT Neo6 SE if you value sustained performance, especially for gaming and demanding applications, and prefer a more modern chipset architecture. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 provides a more future-proof experience.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 in the Realme GT Neo6 SE handle demanding games like Genshin Impact at high settings?
Yes, the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 is a capable chipset for gaming. It should comfortably run Genshin Impact at high settings with stable frame rates, though you may need to adjust graphics settings for extended play sessions to manage thermals. The improved GPU architecture provides a significant advantage over the Dimensity 8200 in this regard.
❓ How long does it *actually* take to fully charge the vivo Y100t with 120W charging?
While vivo doesn't provide exact 0-100% times, users report a full charge from 0% to 100% taking around 25-30 minutes. The initial charge from 0-50% is incredibly fast, but charging slows down as the battery nears full capacity to protect battery health.
❓ Does the Realme GT Neo6 SE support 5G connectivity, and on which bands?
Yes, the Realme GT Neo6 SE supports 5G connectivity. Specific band support will vary by region, but it generally covers the major 5G bands used by carriers globally. Check the official Realme website for detailed band compatibility in your region.
❓ Is the software experience significantly different between Realme UI and vivo’s Funtouch OS?
Yes, there are noticeable differences. Realme UI is generally considered closer to stock Android with a cleaner interface and fewer pre-installed apps. Funtouch OS, while improved in recent versions, historically has been more heavily customized and includes more bloatware. Both offer similar core features, but the aesthetic and user experience differ.